Skip to content

Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations: Cost and Benefit Trade-offs

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

BSR November

By Julie Stackhouse, Executive Vice President

This post is part of a series titled “Supervising Our Nation’s Financial Institutions.” The series, written by Julie Stackhouse, executive vice president and officer-in-charge of supervision at the St. Louis Federal Reserve, is expected to appear at least once each month throughout 2017.

Consumer financial protection has been in the spotlight recently, with the well-publicized decision by Congress to overturn a regulation that had been finalized by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in July. The rule would have prevented financial firms from requiring customers to use the arbitration process to resolve disputes, rather than participate in class-action lawsuits. Congressional action on this so-called “mandatory arbitration clause” has been touted by some as a victory for banks and a loss for consumers.

New consumer laws and regulations tend to provoke controversy. On the one hand, consumer protections are important to minimize egregious behavior by financial firms when they deal with consumers who may not fully understand a credit or deposit product or realize their legal rights.

On the other hand, new regulations—including consumer protection rules—usually have consequences for the availability or cost of these products. For that reason, financial institutions often express concern with the advent of new regulations.

Impact of Consumer Financial Regulations

Calculating the benefits and costs of consumer financial regulations—or any regulations, for that matter—is not easy. Financial institutions do not routinely report expense data that tie directly into the implementation of individual regulations, although survey data make it clear that the cost of regulatory compliance hits the smallest financial institutions the hardest, as seen in the table below.

Compliance Expenses as a Percentage of Noninterest Expenses
U.S. Community Banks, 2014-2016
Asset Size 2014 2015 2016
Less Than $100 Million 7.67% 11.77% 10.44%
$100 Million to $250 Million 5.55% 8.12% 7.85%
$250 Million to $500 Million 4.91% 7.02% 7.20%
$500 Million to $1 Billion 3.78% 5.83% 5.64%
$1 Billion to $10 Billion 2.54% 6.03% 5.98%
SOURCE: Author's calculations based on data presented at the 2017 Community Banking Research and Policy Conference
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Institutions also do not report whether they have stopped offering a product or service to some or all consumers or businesses because of an increase in compliance costs. Likewise, there is no definitive way to quantify the cost or inconvenience to consumers or businesses when a financial product is discontinued by a local institution or pricing is adjusted to reflect inherent compliance costs.

Importance of Education and Incentives

Even with protections, regulation alone may not be enough to prevent consumers from reaching beyond their means, especially when emergencies occur. A combination of financial education throughout school-age years and incentives to save from a very early age may well hold the greatest promise for “financial capability,” or your ability to act on financial knowledge and a product offering. Albeit aspirational, the idea of financially capable consumers offers an alternative to growing regulation.

Follow the Series

Additional Resources

Posted In Banking  |  Tagged julie stackhouseconsumer financial protection bureaucompliance costsarbitrationregulationbankingbanking regulation
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.