By Julie Stackhouse, Executive Vice President
This post is part of a series titled “Supervising Our Nation’s Financial Institutions.” The series, written by Julie Stackhouse, executive vice president and officer-in-charge of supervision at the St. Louis Federal Reserve, is expected to appear at least once each month throughout 2017.
Banking regulation is marked by a seeming alphabet soup of regulatory bodies. The regulatory system we have now reflects the diversity of U.S. financial institutions and a number of legislative responses to banking crises that have occurred over time. Today, banks are regulated by multiple authorities, including the Federal Reserve.
The responsibility for prudential regulation—monitoring and regulating banks for safety and soundness and adequate capital—is divided among three federal regulators:
Banks are also required to comply with numerous consumer protection laws and regulations. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), an independent agency created under the Dodd-Frank Act, is responsible for writing most rules and regulations that apply to financial services companies, including banks.
The CFPB also examines banks and nonbank financial institutions with assets of more than $10 billion for compliance with consumer laws and regulations related to financial services. The three federal banking agencies enforce consumer protection rules for the banks they supervise that have assets of less than $10 billion.
The division of prudential and consumer compliance regulatory responsibilities is outlined in the table below.
|U.S. Banking Regulatory Structure
Prudential and Consumer Compliance Regulation
|State Member Bank||Nonmember Bank||National Bank|
|State Regulator||State of Charter||State of Charter||None|
|Primary Federal Regulator||Federal Reserve||FDIC||OCC|
|Deposit Insurance Regulator||FDIC||FDIC||FDIC|
|Consumer Compliance Regulator (Less than $10 Billion in Assets)||Federal Reserve||State||OCC|
|Consumer Compliance Regulator ($10 Billion or More in Assets)||CFPB||CFPB||CFPB|
|Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis|
State banking agencies also have regulatory responsibilities for the banks chartered in their states. To avoid duplication and regulatory burden, federal and state banking regulators coordinate exam schedules and often alternate exams.
A number of other federal and state regulators have a hand in bank supervision because of some of the products and services banks may provide. This approach is called functional regulation.
The Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and state insurance commissioners and securities regulators are some of the outside agencies involved in regulation of financial activities.
The sheer number of agencies involved in bank regulation—especially those tasked with safety and soundness regulation—frequently prompts calls for regulatory consolidation. Some observers express concern about duplication and its associated effects on regulatory burden. Others worry about a “race to the bottom,” where excessive competition among regulators for banking clients may lead to lax standards and enforcement to curry favor.
Although both concerns are valid, there’s little evidence that either of those possibilities have occurred to any measurable extent. Rather than racing to the bottom, multiple regulators offer a practical choice to smaller banks and serve as a check on inefficiencies at fellow agencies.