Minorities See Smaller Gains from Increased Education

Thursday, May 4, 2017

college disparity
Thinkstock/George Kuna

This post is the second in a two-part series on the role that higher education may play in increasing racial and ethnic disparities in income and wealth. Today’s post looks at how the gains from college education differ across races and ethnicities.

Our previous post looked at disparities in the attainment of four-year college degrees among different races and ethnicities. In particular, African-Americans and Hispanics born after the baby boom have fallen further behind whites in terms of college-degree attainment rates.

Along with gaps in the “quantity” of education, there are also gaps in the “quality” of college degrees, according to a recent issue of In the Balance. Lead Economist William Emmons and Lead Analyst Lowell Ricketts of the St. Louis Fed’s Center for Household Financial Stability found that economic and financial returns from college degrees differ by race and ethnicity.

Quality Gaps

The authors examined two approximations of the quality of education:

  • Comparing the median income of nonwhite families with similarly educated white families
  • Comparing the median net worth of nonwhite families with similarly educated white families

The figure below plots the ratios of nonwhite family incomes in 2013 to their white counterparts by education level.

college income

“The median family incomes of all nonwhite groups trailed their equally educated white counterparts’,” Emmons and Ricketts wrote. “Moreover, the generally declining relative incomes across increasing education levels among Hispanics and blacks suggest that the income gains associated with successive levels of education are lower for many Hispanic and black families than for their white counterparts.”

When using ratios of median net worth, disparities also appeared. (See figure below.)

college net worth

The authors noted that the two figures suggest that both income and wealth gains from higher levels of education are generally lower for nonwhite families than for whites.

“These discrepancies generally grow at successively higher levels of education for Hispanics and blacks,” Emmons and Ricketts wrote. “Only at the very top is there some evidence of a reversal in this trend for wealth, although substantial gaps remain.”

Growing Gaps

“Education is not the great equalizer it once was—if it ever was,” the authors wrote.

The disparities in both college-degree attainment rates and the payoff of increased education “suggest that racial and ethnic income and wealth gaps are likely to grow larger in the future,” they wrote.

The authors emphasized that despite differences in returns, more education generally pays off for all races and ethnicities.

However, Emmons and Ricketts identified what they described as “two uncomfortable facts”:

  • Successive generations of Hispanics and blacks are falling further behind their white and Asian counterparts in obtaining a four-year degree.
  • The payoffs for greater education among Hispanics and blacks are generally lower than those for whites and Asians.

“As a consequence of these quantity and quality gaps, higher education unintentionally has become an engine for widening disparities rather than for accelerating the convergence of economic and financial opportunities across races and ethnicities,” Emmons and Ricketts concluded.

Additional Resources

Posted In FinancialLabor  |  Tagged william emmonslowell rickettswealth inequalitywealth gapeducationincome inequalityhfscenter for household financial stability
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Subscribe

Feedspot blog award

The On the Economy blog recently ranked in the top 20 on Feedspot’s list of top bank blogs.

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.


Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.

Categories