The amount of trade between two countries depends on several factors. A recent article in The Regional Economist discussed some of those factors.1
Comparative advantage occurs when one country can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another country. The authors noted that comparative advantages in production can be generated by differences in the skill sets of the labor forces of the countries, differences in the quality of the physical capital, and differences in the quality or abundance of natural resources used as inputs, among other things.
Some policies may impose large barriers to trade, obviously deterring trade from occurring. Other types of policies may have impacts as well. For example, monetary policy rules that target the exchange rate can shift relative prices between two countries, making trade more or less favorable.
An example of the impact of trade agreements can be seen in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which is being negotiated between the European Union and the U.S. The TTIP would standardize regulations in the production of goods, so that, for example, the safety features of cars would not have to be approved by both countries involved.
As an iceberg drifts away from its place of origin, it melts and grows smaller. Similarly, as the distance grows between two countries, the costs of trading goods increase, and the benefits of trade decrease. The authors pointed out that distance can mean more than just physical distance, including issues such as access to transportation.
However, some economists have proposed that physical distance may be becoming less important than countries simply being similar to one another. The authors wrote, “In our rapidly globalizing and technologically advancing world, country-specific characteristics, such as common language spoken and laws regarding conflict resolution, supersede the significance of physical distance in determining the prevalence of trade between countries.”
1 This post is based on a sidebar to an article written by Assistant Vice President and Economist Michael Owyang, Senior Research Associate Diana Cooke, Research Fellow Christopher Otrok—all with the St. Louis Fed—and M. Ayhan Kose, director of the Development Prospects Group at the World Bank. Otrok is also the Sam B. Cook Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri.
The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.
- Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
- For commercial use, including spam
- Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
- Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
- Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.