What the Markets Are Signaling about Inflation Expectations and Fed Credibility

Monday, July 13, 2015
inflation expectations and fed credibility
Shutterstock/M DOGAN

By Christopher J. Neely, Assistant Vice President and Economist

Credibility is the quality of being believed. Central banks struggled for years to regain credibility after the high inflation of the 1970s. Disturbingly, it would appear that markets are again doubting central banks’ willingness or ability to achieve their stated goals.

Price stability is one of the Fed’s two congressional mandates.1 While Congress never explicitly defined price stability, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has long interpreted price stability to mean 2 percent personal consumption expenditures price index (PCE) inflation, and this interpretation has been explicit since January 2012.2

In setting policies, the FOMC considers public or financial market expectations of many variables, including inflation. Inflation expectations are particularly important because they can help the FOMC directly gauge whether policy is too tight or too accommodative to achieve price stability. If expected inflation is higher (lower) than the FOMC's target, then this might indicate that expected monetary policy is too accommodative (tight).

inflation expectations and fed credibility

One can measure expected inflation in several ways. One way is through “breakeven” inflation—a market consumer price index (CPI) inflation forecast—from the spread between yields of bonds with CPI inflation-adjusted payouts (Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS) and yields of bonds with payouts that do not depend on inflation.

As of July 1, breakeven CPI inflation over five- and 10-year horizons were 1.60 percent and 1.89 percent, respectively. Those figures had dipped as low as 1.05 percent and 1.54 percent, respectively, on Jan. 13—just prior to the European Central Bank’s announcement of a quantitative easing program.

In addition, the FOMC’s target of PCE inflation has averaged 0.3 percentage points less than CPI inflation per year over the past 10 years.3 Subtracting 0.3 percentage points from CPI breakeven inflation rates suggests that breakeven PCE inflation rates were 1.30 percent and 1.59 percent for five and 10 years, respectively, as of July 1.

The fact that market-implied PCE inflation forecasts are well below the official 2 percent target suggests that markets doubt the Fed will hit its inflation target. This is a problem because economists generally think that central banks should be able to control average inflation over such long horizons. It indicates lack of credibility.

Why do markets think that the Fed can’t control inflation over such a long horizon? There are at least two possible explanations. First, markets might believe that the Fed will systematically overpredict inflation, which would mean less accommodative policy than necessary to hit the inflation target. The fact that the Fed and private forecasters have repeatedly overpredicted inflation since 2012 is consistent with this explanation.

Second, markets might believe that economic conditions will be so weak—the equilibrium real interest rate will be so low—that the Fed will be unable to hit a 2 percent inflation target. This is a much more disturbing possibility.

Notes and References

1 The other is maximum employment. Most central banks have price stability as one of their mandates.

2 See the FOMC press release from Jan. 25, 2012.

3 The difference over the past 50 years is larger, with PCE inflation trailing CPI inflation by an average of 0.53 percentage points per year.

Additional Resources

Posted In Inflation  |  Tagged christopher neelyinflationfomcinflation expectationsbreakeven inflation
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.


Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.

Categories