Lifetime Education Benefits Have Never Been So High

Tuesday, August 04, 2015
lifetime education benefits
Thinkstock/Wavebreakmedia Ltd

Most people are familiar with the education premium, which says that people typically experience greater income as their level of education goes up. A new study shows that the lifetime benefits of additional education have never been as high as they are now.

In an article in The Regional Economist, Senior Economist Guillaume Vandenbroucke calculated a “lifetime education premium,” which aimed to accomplish two things:

  • It is an attempt to measure the difference between the earnings of people with different educational attainment.
  • It measures lifetime earnings, not just earnings at a particular age.1

The second point is particularly key, as the education premium changes from year to year, due to the wages of different workers growing at different rates. Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Vandenbroucke calculated the present value of future earnings for three groups:

  • No high school
  • High school
  • College2

These groups were further organized by the year they turned 30 and by decade. Someone who was age 30 in 1940 belonged to the 1940 cohort, someone who was 30 in 1950 belonged to the 1950 cohort and so on.

The lifetime earnings among the education groups can be estimated for each cohort. For example, the present value of future earnings for someone in the 1940 cohort without a high school education was $562,300. It was $719,000 for someone with a high school education, and it was $986,300 for someone with a college education.3 (See The Regional Economist article “Lifetime Benefits of an Education Have Never Been So High” for the lifetime earnings of each group and each cohort studied.)

Vandenbroucke then calculated two education premiums:

  • The high school premium, or the difference in lifetime income between those with and without high school diplomas
  • The college premium, or the difference in lifetime income between those who graduated college and those who only graduated high school

Using the 1940 cohort example, the high school premium would be calculated as $719,000 / $562,300 – 1 = 0.28, for a premium of 28 percent. The table below shows the high school and college premiums for each of the cohorts studied.

lifetime education benefits

Vandenbroucke concluded, “Understanding education choices is important since education determines, to a large extent, a worker’s earnings. But measuring the benefits of an education is not that easy. I presented a simple measure of the benefits of purchasing an education for a sequence of cohorts and showed that these benefits have been on the rise for the last cohort. In fact, the lifetime financial benefits of an education have never been so high.”

Notes and References

1 It should be noted that this premium is calculated without considering the cost of education. Vandenbroucke also only considered white males, as the education and earnings of women and/or nonwhite people may involve issues of discrimination that could not be covered in this particular analysis.

2 “No high school” refers to workers whose highest educational attainment was grade 11. “High school” refers to workers who completed high school and up to three years of college. “College” refers to workers who completed at least four years of college.

3 All figures are expressed in 2010 dollars. Also, Vandenbroucke used an interest rate of 4 percent in calculating the present values of future earnings, as the one-year Treasury rate fluctuated around this rate between the 1950s and 1990s.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged guillaume vandenbrouckeeducationlifetime education premium
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email For all other blog-related questions or comments, email