The Financial Gaps Widen between Those with Advanced Degrees and Everyone Else

Monday, June 15, 2015
education, income, wealth
Thinkstock/Rawpixel Ltd

The gaps in income and wealth between households headed by someone with a professional or graduate degree and everyone else have been widening, according to an essay by the St. Louis Fed’s Center for Household Financial Stability (HFS).

In the second essay of “The Demographics of Wealth” series, Senior Economic Adviser William Emmons and Lead Policy Analyst Bryan Noeth, both with HFS, examined the correlation between education and wealth. Using data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances for the period 1989-2013, they divided families into four groups:1

  • Those headed by someone with less than a high school diploma or GED
  • Those headed by someone with exactly a high school diploma or GED
  • Those headed by someone with exactly a two- or four-year degree
  • Those headed by someone with a graduate or professional degree


Of those four groups, only one had a median inflation-adjusted income that was higher in 2013 than 1989: those with advanced degrees saw their median income rise 4 percent. Median incomes fell 1 percent for those without a high school diploma or GED, 16 percent for those with only a high school diploma or GED and 5 percent for those with a two- or four-year degree.

Accordingly, the earnings per family relative to those with advanced degrees also fell during this period. As a percent of the median income among families with a graduate or professional degree:

  • The income of a median college family declined from 72 percent to 66 percent.
  • The income of a median high school family declined from 44 percent to 35 percent.
  • The income of a median family without a high school diploma declined from 20 percent to 19 percent.


Those with advanced degrees also saw a significant increase in median net worth over the same period. The median wealth of this group rose 45 percent, while median wealth rose just 3 percent for those with two- or four-year degrees and declined 36 percent and 44 percent for those with and without a high school diploma or GED, respectively.

These numbers translate to declines in median wealth relative to families with advanced degrees. For college families, their relative wealth fell from 56 percent to 40 percent; for high school families, from 31 percent to 14 percent; and for no-high school families, from 14 percent to 5 percent.

The authors noted that the fact that wealth gaps were growing faster than income gaps suggests that factors beyond schooling are playing a role. They wrote, “These factors, in other words, may be increasing the extent to which the correlation between education and wealth is spurious—that is, caused not by educational attainment itself but by factors correlated with it, such as ability, family background, assortative mating and others discussed previously.”

Notes and References

1 The authors limited the sample to families with a head of household who was 40 years old or older, because by age 40, the vast majority of adults have completed their formal education.

Additional Resources

Posted In Financial  |  Tagged william emmonsbryan noethhousehold financial stabilitywealth inequalityincome inequalityeducationdemographics of wealth
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email For all other blog-related questions or comments, email