Skip to content

U.S.-China Trade War: Shifting to Importing from Other Nations

Monday, December 23, 2019

By Subhayu Bandyopadhyay, Research Officer and Economist, and Asha Bharadwaj, Research Associate

The recent U.S. tariffs on China are expected to reduce economic efficiency. First, the higher tariffs will render some of China’s exports to the U.S. uncompetitive, thus reducing imports. The move from a more efficient producer in China to a less efficient domestic source is an efficiency loss.

Second, the tariffs could lead to what trade economists refer to as “trade diversion.” A less efficient producer in, say, Vietnam may become competitive relative to a more efficient Chinese producer due to tariffs, incentivizing the U.S. to switch imports from China to Vietnam. This would also be an efficiency loss for the U.S. as imports would be sourced from a less efficient nation.

While higher tariffs on China are dampening U.S.-China trade, effects on other nations through trade diversion are less clear. The remainder of this piece focuses on this issue.

Evidence of Trade Diversion

The figure below considers year-over-year changes in U.S. imports from China and two of its prominent neighboring nations—Taiwan and Vietnam—for the 2016-2019 period.

Imports from China have fallen significantly and consistently through most months of 2019 so far compared to earlier years in the figure. However, imports from Taiwan and Vietnam have gone the other direction. They show consistent and significant increases through most of 2019.

In other words, there is reason to believe that some of the loss in U.S. imports from China have resulted in trade diversion to Taiwan and Vietnam. Although clear identification of such trade diversion effects is beyond the scope of this piece, a recent paper by economist Alessandro Nicita carefully analyzed the trade war’s effects and found significant trade diversion.Nicita, Alessandro. “Trade and trade diversion effects of United States tariffs on China (PDF).” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Research Paper No. 37, November 2019.

Implications of the Trade War-Induced Trade Diversion

Usual discussion of trade diversion arises in the context of pros and cons of preferential trading agreements like NAFTA. In these agreements, trade creation effects of lower tariffs between members of the trading bloc have to be weighed against trade diversion losses vis a vis trade with non-members.

In the current trade war, there are losses on both counts:

  • Trade destruction between the U.S. and China
  • Trade diversion from China to other nations

It is possible that the costs of the current trade war could lead the U.S. and China to negotiate a new and better trading regime, which may justify the trade war. On the other hand, if no such agreement is reached, costly adjustments will have to be made by trading partners, reorienting whom they trade with more intensively.

While the outcome of such a process will be clearer in the future, what we see now is that the trade war has resulted in significant losses for both the U.S. and China, with perhaps some benefits to some other potential U.S. trading partners like Vietnam.

Notes and References

1 Nicita, Alessandro. “Trade and trade diversion effects of United States tariffs on China (PDF).” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Research Paper No. 37, November 2019.

Additional Resources

Posted In Trade  |  Tagged subhayu bandyopadhyayasha bharadwajtradechinatariffstaiwanvietnam
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.