Skip to content

How Income Inequality Is Affected by Labor Share

Monday, July 31, 2017
labor share in advanced economies
Thinkstock/Kim Steele

By Ana Maria Santacreu, Economist, and Heting Zhu, Research Associate

The labor share of most advanced economies has declined since the 1980s, and this decline has been associated with an increase in income inequality. This post finds that, indeed, inequality increased more in advanced economies that experienced a larger decline in the labor share.1

Measuring Labor Share

The labor share is the share of gross domestic product (GDP) that is paid as compensation in the form of wages, salaries and other benefits (such as pensions and insurance), and it is informative about the distribution of income between labor and capital.

As seen in the figure below, labor share declined 3.3 percentage points in advanced economies from 1980 to 2015.2

labor share of income in advanced economies

The Role of Technological Progress

The labor share (αL) is computed as the ratio of labor income (W * L) to nominal income (P * Y), or equivalently, as the ratio of relative wages (W / P) to labor productivity (Y / L):

αL = (W * L) / (P * Y) = (W / P) / (Y / L)

Hence, changes in the labor share can be explained by changes in the real wage and by changes in labor productivity.

Productivity Increases Outpacing Wage Increases

One of the explanations for the decline of the labor share has been an increase in productivity that has outpaced an increase in real wages, with several studies attributing half the decline to this trend.

This increase in productivity has been driven by technological progress, as manifested in a decline in the relative price of investment (that is, the price of investment relative to the price of consumption).3 As the relative price of investment decreases, the cost of capital goes down, and firms have an incentive to substitute capital for labor. As a result, the labor share declines.

The decline in the labor share that results from a decline in the relative price of investment has contributed to an increase in inequality: A decrease in the cost of capital tends to induce automation in routine tasks, such as bookkeeping, clerical work, and repetitive production and monitoring activities. These are tasks performed mainly by middle-skill workers.4

Hence, these are the segments of the population that are more affected by a reduction in the relative price of investment. The figure below displays the correlation between changes in the advanced economies’ labor share and their Gini coefficients (which measure income inequality).

connection between gini coefficient and labor share

Policy Implications

Technological progress promotes economic growth, but as the findings above suggest, it can also reduce the welfare of a large part of the working population and eventually have a negative effect on economic growth.

An important role for policymakers would be to smooth the transition when more jobs are taken over by the de-routinization process. At the end of the day, technology should relieve people from performing repetitive tasks and increase the utility of our everyday lives.

Notes and References

1World Economic Outlook.” International Monetary Fund, April 2017.

2 The definition of an advanced economy comes from the IMF world outlook report grouping.

3 Karabarbounis, Loukas; and Neiman, Brent. “The Global Decline of the Labor Share.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 2014, Vol. 129. Issue 1, pp. 61-103.

4 Autor, David; and Dorn, David. “The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market.” American Economic Review, August 2013, Vol. 103, Issue 5, pp. 1553-97.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged ana maria santacreuheting zhuincome inequalitylaborlabor share gross domestic product
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.