Skip to content

Why Did the Housing Bust Hit Black and Latino Families Harder?


Thursday, August 10, 2017
house bust hitting black and latino families harder
Thinkstock/Raxpixel

While the housing market collapse affected millions of American families, it hit black and Latino families especially hard. This is because so much of their wealth was tied up in housing, according to the latest edition of Housing Market Perspectives.

Home Equity and Wealth

William Emmons, lead economist of the St. Louis Fed’s Center for Household Financial Stability and author of the article, pointed out that homeowners’ equity (HOE)1 has long been the single largest component of wealth for black and Latino families:

  • Average HOE accounted for 46 percent and 43 percent of black and Latino families’ wealth, respectively, for the past quarter century.
  • It accounted for 32 percent of the wealth of Asian or other families.
  • It accounted for 27 percent of the wealth of white families.

Indeed, during peaks in 1989 and around the financial crisis starting in 2007, HOE climbed to even more than 50 percent of the wealth of the average black and Latino family. (For a figure showing these trends, see the article “Homeownership and the Racial Wealth Divide.”)

However, Emmons said, “After 2007, large price declines and the loss of many homes through foreclosure or other distressed transactions served to reduce the 2013 share of wealth attributed to HOE to 40 percent for black families and to 42 percent for Latino families.”

HOE Contributions to Wealth

Over the long term, HOE contributed less than other assets to wealth accumulation during the 1989-2013 period, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest Survey of Consumer Finances, Emmons noted.

“The drag exerted by poorly performing housing assets on total wealth accumulation is starkly illuminated when comparing the major racial and ethnic groups,” he wrote.

During this time period, as shown in the table below, the inflation-adjusted value of HOE increased by only 0.5 percent per year for Hispanic families and actually declined, on average, by 0.4 percent per year for black families. By contrast, white and Asian families saw significant increases (1.2 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively).

Average Annual Percent Change in Inflation-Adjusted Asset Values
1989-2013
  Homeowners' Equity All Other Assets Less Liabilities, Excluding HOE Total Wealth (All Assets Less All Liabilities)
Black -0.4% 2.3% 1.0%
Hispanic 0.5% 2.1% 1.3%
Asian or Other 2.5% 2.9% 2.8%
White Non-Hispanic 1.2% 2.3% 2.0%
All Families 1.0% 2.1% 1.8%
SOURCE: Federal Reserve Board Survey of Consumer Finances, 2013.
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The final column in the table shows a lag in average overall wealth gains for black and Latino families when compared with white and Asian families. Emmons also discussed the cumulative percentage increases in total average wealth from 1989-2013.

“The relatively low cumulative increases in long-run wealth for black and Latino families resulted from large declines in asset values after 2007, when the financial crisis and then the Great Recession took their toll,” Emmons said, adding that black and Latino families experienced greater average overall wealth gains than white and Asian families from 1989-2004.

Notes and References

1 HOE is the market value of residential real estate minus the value of home-secured debt.

Additional Resources

Posted In FinancialHousing  |  Tagged william emmonshousinghousing marketshome equityhomeownershipmortgageswealth
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.