How Volatile Are the Volatility Indexes?

Thursday, January 07, 2016

By YiLi Chien, Senior Economist, and Paul Morris, Research Analyst

The volatility of stock markets is a closely watched gauge of investor sentiment. This post documents that the volatility indexes of stock markets in the U.S. and Europe are themselves volatile and highly correlated.

We used the VIX to represent the volatility index of the U.S. stock market and the VSTOXX for the European stock market. These indexes measure their respective market’s expectation of volatility in the near future. Our data cover all trading dates of 2015. The figure below shows the two indexes over the past year.


There are several important features worth documenting. Both indexes are highly volatile. For example, both indexes suddenly doubled in value within one week in mid-August. They also can drop dramatically within a short period of time, such as when the level of the VSTOXX declined from around 31 to around 17 in two weeks in July. The indexes are also highly correlated with each other. The correlation is around 0.8 in our sample period, which represents a highly positive correlation.

And the volatility indexes respond sensitively to events that cause uncertainty. The period between March and July marked an escalation of tension between Ukraine and Russia. During this period, the VSTOXX increased from less than 20 to more than 30, while the VIX remained relatively stable. The different paths of these indexes reflect that the geopolitical issues between Ukraine and Russia increased the uncertainty of the European stock market more than that of the U.S. market.

An episode of rising volatility that affected both markets occurred in the middle of August. Markets seemingly reacted to global growth concerns as well as the possibility of a rate hike at the Federal Open Market Committee meeting in September.

Why are these indexes so volatile and highly correlated? The first and most straightforward explanation is that market uncertainty is quite volatile and highly correlated across markets. In addition, changes in attitude toward risk can help explain this phenomenon, as observed by changes in risk premium. If investors suddenly become more risk averse, then the compensation of holding risky assets (measured by risk premium) should increase for investors to continue to hold risky assets. In this situation, the volatility may rise even if the actual uncertainty of the stock markets doesn’t change.

This is why volatility indexes—and the VIX in particular—are often denoted the “fear” index, reflecting the effect that risk attitude has on market volatility. Empirical studies have tried to distinguish and weight the relative importance of these two factors. The 2013 study by Geert Bekaert, Marie Hoerova and Marco Lo Duca found that adjusting monetary policy moves the volatility index, using as vehicles both the market uncertainty and risk aversion factors highlighted above.1 Their study also documents that the risk aversion factor plays a larger role relative to the uncertainty factor.

Notes and References

1 Bekaert, Geert; Hoerova, Marie; and Lo Duca, Marco. "Risk, Uncertainty and Monetary Policy." Journal of Monetary Economics, 2013, Vol. 60, Issue 7, pp. 771-88.

Additional Resources

Posted In Financial  |  Tagged yili chienvixvstoxxstock marketvolatility
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email For all other blog-related questions or comments, email