China's Currency and Net International Income Flow

Monday, August 01, 2016
china current account liberalization
Thinkstock/kunertus

By Ana Maria Santacreu, Economist, and Usa Kerdnunvong, Senior Research Associate

Since 2005, the United States has been a net borrower from the rest of the world, while China has been a net lender. However, the U.S. has had positive net international income in recent years, while China has had negative net income. Policy changes by China could change that.

The current account deficit the U.S. has been running implies that it has been importing more goods and services than it exports, thus exporting financial assets. China, on the other hand, has had a surplus and has been a net lender to the rest of the world. In effect, China has been financing the U.S. current account deficit by buying U.S. assets. (For figures showing the current account trends for both countries, see our Economic Synopses essay “Potential U.S. Consequences of China’s Capital Account Liberalization.”)

Despite the U.S. being a net borrower, its net income has been positive and increasing. This is because the return on its assets has been higher than the return it has been paying for its liabilities. China has seen the opposite: It has been paying a higher return from its liabilities than it has been receiving from its external assets. (Figures showing these trends are also available in our essay “Potential U.S. Consequences of China’s Capital Account Liberalization.”)

This discrepancy stems from the portfolios of each country:

  • The U.S.’s assets are mostly portfolio equity and derivatives, and its liabilities are mostly low-risk (and, thus, low return) Treasuries.1,2
  • China’s assets are mostly sovereign bonds from low-risk countries, and its liabilities are mostly foreign direct investment in China, which has more risk and pays a higher return.

However, China has been moving to expand the renminbi’s role in the global monetary system. These efforts may allow Chinese households, firms and institutional investors to diversify their portfolios and invest in international markets, including foreign direct investment and purchases of debt and equity portfolios. In turn, China could start earning higher returns than those available through holding safe but low-yield bonds.

As we concluded in our essay, this shift could reduce China’s currency risk if the U.S. dollar depreciates. If it also reduces official purchases of U.S. assets, the yield the United States must pay on those assets may increase slightly.

Notes and References

1 Lane, Philip R. and Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria. “The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970-2004.”Journal of International Economics, November 2007, Vol. 73, Issue 2, pp. 223-50.

2 Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rey, Helene. “From World Banker to World Venture Capitalist: U.S. External Adjustment and the Exorbitant Privilege,” in Richard H. Clarida, ed., G-7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 11-55.

Additional Resources

Posted In Trade  |  Tagged ana maria santacreuusa kerdnunvongchinarenminbiyuancapital accountcurrent account
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.


Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.

Categories