How Have Prime-Age Workers in School Affected the Labor Market?

Monday, September 07, 2015
schooling and labor force participation
Thinkstock/kasto80

By Maria E. Canon, Economist

Many argue that even though the unemployment rate is low, labor market conditions are not strong because labor force participation has fallen substantially over the past few years. The concern is that the labor market won’t be able to absorb those who stopped looking for work once they return to the labor force.

An example is the members of the prime-age population (people age 25-54) who are continuing their education instead of participating in the labor force. To see how much this group might affect the health of the labor market, we compared the distribution of the population 16 years and older in the first five months of 2015 (the most recent data as of the time this analysis was completed) with the distribution in 2005. The results are in the charts below.

schooling and labor force participation

schooling and labor force participation

As many have argued, the decrease in labor force participation corresponded to a significant increase in the number of people in school. The concern is that workers will flood the labor market once economic conditions improve, significantly increasing unemployment. To test this, we simulated what the unemployment rate would be if those additional students were indeed unemployed workers.

If the same share of the population was attending school in 2015 as it was in 2005, the unemployment rate in May would have been 8.1 percent instead of the 5.5 percent observed that month. However, this is a very extreme case. As we argued earlier this year, a significant fraction of the young population (16-24 years old) increased their schooling rates due to more structural reasons. So, we consider two more-plausible scenarios.

In the first scenario, we kept the increase in schooling of the population 16-21 that has occurred over the past 10 years. But we kept the share of the population 22 and older that attends school in 2015 at its 2005 levels. In this scenario, the May unemployment rate would have been 6.6 percent instead of the 5.5 percent observed that month.

In the second scenario, we considered an increase in graduate studies. Suppose that the increase in schooling of the population 16-24 is kept, but the share of the population 25 and older that attends school in 2015 remains at its 2005 levels. The unemployment rate in May would have been 6.1 percent instead of 5.5 percent.

The data on schooling rates show that most of the increase in schooling has been among the young population. There are no reasons to think that prime-age workers discouraged by the health of the labor market and attending school might be disguising the real conditions of the labor market.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged maria canonlaborlabor force participationunemployment rate
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.


Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.

Categories