In the wake of the Great Recession, unemployment benefits doubled over a three-year period. The increase in benefits triggered an increase in attention to the unemployment insurance system, including to cases of fraud. However, the cases that seem to draw the most attention from media appeared to make up only a small fraction of the overpayments due to fraud.
Unemployment insurance fraud occurs whenever an ineligible individual collects benefits after intentionally misreporting his or her eligibility. As an example, prisoners aren’t eligible to receive unemployment benefits, as they aren’t able and available to work. Yet in July 2012, cases of prisoners receiving benefits were reported in Arizona and Indiana.1
In a 2012 Economic Synopses essay, Deputy Director of Research B. Ravikumar, along with co-authors David Fuller of Concordia University and Yuzhe Zhang of Texas A&M University, compared the unemployment insurance overpayments due to people being unable and unavailable to work to the total amounts of overpayments due to fraud. The results are in the table below.
To help put this into perspective, total benefits paid out averaged $110.8 billion per year over this period. Thus, overpayments due to all fraud were less than 3 percent of total payments, and overpayments due to “Unable and Unavailable to Work” fraud amounted to about one-tenth of 1 percent of total payments.
So what type is most prevalent? The authors also examined different types of unemployment insurance fraud. They found that the majority of fraud cases (almost two-thirds of total overpayments due to fraud) were due to “concealed earnings,” or collecting benefits despite being employed and receiving wages.
Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.
The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.
Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.