By David Wiczer, Economist
Are recessions bad for the unemployed?
In a sense, yes, and in a sense, no. Of course, there are many ways to quantify the effects of unemployment beyond the direct effect of the loss of income. There is a further loss because, on average, workers who go through an unemployment spell receive lower wages in their next job. This re-employment wage effect of unemployment is no different between recession and expansion. Throughout the distribution of wage changes—whether the worker is gaining or losing wages—the marginal effect of having gone through unemployment is nearly the same and statistically indistinguishable.
To see this effect, we examined job changers via the Survey of Income and Program Participation over the period 1996-2013. Each of these workers had some change in wages from their past job to their next job, and some of them switched jobs with an intervening unemployment spell. We wanted to see how a spell of unemployment brings down wages compared with someone who moved directly from one job to another. This analysis focuses on the short-run effect of a job change, comparing the final month with the previous employer with the first month with the next.
First, we estimated the effect of several variables that might determine the change in wages. (In the parlance, the dependent variable is change in wages. The independent variables include whether there was an unemployment spell and whether the job change involved an occupation change as well.)
The result of this estimation will be the average effect on wage changes from an unemployment spell. We segmented our sample into months during recessions and months within expansions and estimated the effects separately. The point estimate for the average effect is a loss of 30 percent of wages in expansions and 27 percent in recessions, but these two numbers are not statistically distinct. They are within sampling error of each other.
What if this effect is different for wage gainers or wage losers? Perhaps workers who are the big wage losers do particularly poorly in recession. To address this idea, we looked at the same marginal effect of unemployment, but rather than estimating the mean, we focused on various ranks, or regions, of the distribution of wage changes. That is, are the very big wage losers in the bottom 10th percentile more affected by an unemployment spell? Is the effect different in a recession or expansion?
The answer is that big wage losers lose more from unemployment, but not any more or less in expansion or recession. To see this, we plotted the estimated short-run effect of unemployment at each interval of the wage change distribution. Indeed, the line for the effect during a recession falls right on top of the line for the effect during an expansion.
What is the important takeaway? The rise in unemployment does affect the distribution of wage changes during a recession, but not because it’s more costly to lose your job in a recession. Rather, it’s because there are simply more people being displaced.
Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.
The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.
Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.