Wealth Gap Widens between Young and Old Families

Thursday, July 30, 2015
age wealth gap
Thinkstock/David Sacks

Typically, young families start with very little wealth and accumulate more as they age. Thus, a gap between the wealth levels of young and old families is to be expected. However, that gap has widened considerably over the past few decades.

Researchers from the St. Louis Fed’s Center for Household Financial Stability released the final essay in their “Demographics of Wealth” series, with this essay focusing on age, birth years, income and wealth. Senior Economic Adviser William Emmons and Lead Policy Analyst Bryan Noeth used data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) for the period 1989-2013.1


In general, a family’s2 income started at a low level when young, peaked in middle age, then declined in old age. More specifically, income rose rapidly in percentage terms during a typical family’s 20s. The rate of growth continued, albeit more slowly, throughout the family’s 30s and 40s before peaking around age 50. It plateaued until the family’s early 60s, when it began to decline.

However, a shift has occurred. Old families had the lowest median incomes during the period studied, but this group was the only one to see a net increase. In 1989, the median income of old families was 61.3 percent of the median for all families. By 2013, the median income of old families had risen to 83.0 percent of the median for all families. Median incomes for both young and middle-aged families declined slightly, relative to the overall median income.


Like income, a typical family’s wealth (or net worth) increased for families as they moved from being young through middle-age to being old. Unlike income, wealth tended to level off or perhaps slightly decline after a family reached age 60, rather than decline significantly.

The fact that old families have more wealth than younger families may seem intuitive, but what may be surprising is that the gap between these groups has been widening. The median wealth of old families rose from just under $150,000 in 1989 to about $210,000 in 2013, an increase of about 40 percent. On the other hand, the median wealth of a middle-aged family declined about 31 percent (from $154,000 to $106,000) over the same period. The median wealth of a young family dropped 28 percent from $20,000 to just over $14,000.

The Great Recession played a role in the widening gap. The median wealth of old families dropped 16.7 percent from 2007 to 2013. However, young and middle-aged families experienced much larger drops, with wealth declining 35.5 percent and 47.3 percent, respectively, over the same period.


While the Great Recession may have helped widen the gap between old families and everyone else regarding wealth, it wasn’t the sole reason. The authors noted that old families had generally fared better than young or middle-aged families even through 2007, prior to the recession. They wrote, “Developments reflected in the 2010 and 2013 SCF data accentuated the longer-term trends.”

Notes and References

1 All figures are adjusted for inflation.

2 A family’s age is defined by the age of the head of household. Young families were those under age 40; middle-aged families were those between ages 40 and 61; and old families were those older than age 62.

Additional Resources

Posted In Financial  |  Tagged william emmonsbryan noethdemographics of wealthhousehold financial stability
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.