Oil Prices: Is Supply or Demand behind the Slump?

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

By Alejandro Badel, Economist, and Joseph McGillicuddy, Research Analyst

Oil prices have dropped more than 50 percent since mid-2014. Establishing whether demand or supply factors lie behind this slump is possibly useful for understanding its potential impact on the economy.

We set out to replicate a leading statistical decomposition of the factors affecting oil prices found in the economics literature. We followed the methodology in Lutz Kilian’s 2009 paper “Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market,” a prominent empirical paper about oil prices and macroeconomic variables.1

The model used in the paper consists of a three-variable monthly frequency structural vector auto-regression. The three variables included are:

  • Global crude oil production
  • Global real economic activity measured using an index of freight rates
  • Real crude oil prices

Then, three structural shocks are identified using the following assumptions (exclusion restrictions):

  • “Supply shocks” are the unpredictable component of changes in crude oil production. 
  • “Demand shocks” are the component of innovations in real economic activity that cannot be explained based on crude oil supply shocks.
  • “Oil-specific demand shocks” are innovations to the real price of oil that cannot be explained based on oil supply shocks or aggregate demand shocks.

The figures below show the results obtained from using code provided by the author after updating his dataset.

oil supply shock

oil demand shock

oil specific demand shock

Note: World crude oil production for the period January 1973 through September 2014 is from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). We impute the October and November 2014 data points using total oil production data from the International Energy Agency’s Oil Market Reports. The updated index of real economic activity for the period January 1973 through October 2014 is from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~lkilian/reaupdate.txt. We impute the November 2014 point using the HARPEX index. It should be noted that changing the growth rate of the index by one standard deviation in either direction for November 2014 does not visibly affect the figure. The monthly nominal oil prices for the period January 1974 through November 2014 are from the EIA, while 1973 values are from the Kilian (2009) series.

The figures tell the following story:

  • Between 2003 and 2008, aggregate demand shocks induced a run-up in oil prices.
  • During the 2008 financial crisis, oil-specific demand shocks caused a sharp decline in the price of oil, while aggregate demand shocks ceased their upward pressure on oil prices.
  • Following the financial crisis, positive oil-specific demand shocks and negative aggregate demand shocks resulted in roughly constant oil prices.
  • During the second half of 2014, oil prices declined mostly because of negative oil-specific demand shocks, together with additional negative aggregate demand shocks.

Notes and References

1 Kilian, Lutz. "Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market." American Economic Review, June 2009, 99(3), pp. 1053-69.

Additional Resources

Posted In Output  |  Tagged alejandro badeljoseph mcgillicuddyoiloil prices
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.