The Divergence of Spot Oil Prices

Monday, April 21, 2014

By Michael Owyang, Research Officer

Prior to 2011, the two main spot oil prices—West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent—moved almost in lockstep.  This is not surprising because WTI and Brent crude are essentially the same product, and one would expect arbitrage to eliminate price differentials.  After 2011, the two prices diverged, as seen in the chart below.

The explanation for their divergence might lie in how—or perhaps where—the two prices are determined.  WTI is a grade of crude oil sourced domestically and has prices settled in Cushing, Okla.  Brent is sourced in the North Sea and settled electronically.

In early 2011, Cushing reached its storage capacity, causing a difference between the two spot oil prices that could not be eliminated by arbitrage.  No arbitrage opportunity existed because of the inability to move oil from Cushing to another location where it could be sold for prices closer to the settlement price of Brent crude.

Recently, however, the difference between the two prices has declined.  During the summer of 2013, the difference between the two spot prices declined substantially.  Since then, the difference has risen a bit, but stabilized around $6-$10, considerably less than the $17 average difference between the beginning of 2011 and the end of 2012.

This divergence has caused many to view the American oil price differently.  WTI was commonly considered the American oil price, but many think Brent is now a better measure.

Additional Resources

Posted In Trade  |  Tagged arbitragebrent crudemichael owyangoiloil priceswest texas intermediatewti
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.


Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.

Categories