Oil Prices' Effect on Employment Growth

Tuesday, August 25, 2015
oil prices and employment

U.S. job growth slowed sharply in March, as the nation added only 117,000 jobs (a 55 percent drop below its recent trend). A recent Economic Synopses essay examined this drop for signs of weakness in the job market. Specifically, the authors looked at a possible connection with the recent decline in oil prices.

Economist Maria Canon and Senior Research Associate Yang Liu looked at private nonfarm payroll employment growth over the period March 2014 through May 2015. Regarding the March drop, they noted that:

  • Goods-producing industries added an average of 44,000 jobs per month from March 2014 to February 2015. In March, they lost 20,000 jobs.
  • Service-providing industries added 218,000 jobs per month over the same period. In March, that number dropped to 137,000 jobs.

Canon and Liu noted that more than half of states saw a decline in job numbers, and the states that lost jobs were geographically spread out. However, a few states stood out as major drivers of this slide. In particular, Texas alone accounted for 37 percent of the decline. Other states with notable declines included:

  • Pennsylvania (12 percent of the decline)
  • Georgia (10 percent)
  • Oklahoma (9 percent)
  • North Carolina (8 percent)
  • Missouri (8 percent)
  • Kentucky (8 percent)

Texas and Declining Oil Prices

The authors noted that Texas had been leading the nation in job creation for an extended period. However, its job growth slowed in January and February from its recent average of 29,000 jobs per month. Then in March, jobs declined by more than 24,000.

Canon and Liu posited that the drop in oil prices1 contributed to the decline in jobs both directly and indirectly. The mining and natural resources industry contributed 9 percent of the job losses. Industries related to oil had larger contributions:

  • The wholesale and retail trade industry, which includes oil-related trading, accounted for 28.5 percent of the decline.
  • The professional and business industry, which includes oil-related research, accounted for 24.2 percent of the decline.
  • The construction and manufacturing industries accounted for 18.7 percent and 7.4 percent, respectively.

The authors wrote, “Thus, nearly all the data point to the slack in oil-related industries as the primary driver of the decline of the Texas job market in March.”


The authors concluded, “Overall, the March 2015 U.S. job-growth deceleration corresponds to slack in a few industries. And because the slowdown is concentrated in very few states, it does not appear to be systemic. … Because the data suggest slow job growth in March is linked to low oil prices, long-term effects of the decline seem very unlikely.”

Notes and References

1 The U.S. spot oil price declined from $105.79 per barrel in June 2014 to $47.82 per barrel in March 2015.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged maria canonyang liulaboroiloil pricesemployment growth
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.