Ask an Economist

By

Michael T. Owyang

Michael Owyang is an economist at the St. Louis Fed. His research interests are time series econometrics, forecasting and regional analysis. He likes pepperoni on his pizza and drinks too much coffee. For more on Owyang's work, see http://research.stlouisfed.org/econ/owyang/.

Q. What is potential output, and how is it measured?

A.When discussing the performance of the U.S. economy, people sometimes cite the output gap, which is the difference between actual and potential output. But what is potential output? A common misperception is that it is the maximum output the economy could produce if everyone were employed and all capital were used. Economists define potential output as what can be produced if the economy were operating at maximum sustainable employment, where unemployment is at its natural rate.[1] Therefore, actual output can be either above or below potential output.

Unlike actual GDP, we cannot observe potential GDP and must estimate it. As a result, different economists can have different views of potential output. One way to construct potential GDP is by fitting a trend line through actual GDP. Looking at a short sample period, however, may lead to an inaccurate estimate of potential. For instance, starting in 2000 would lead to a trend line that is defined by the expansion period and is relatively steep. If, on the other hand, output rose above potential during the expansion period, then the trend line would be slightly flatter. The latter case implies that output would have been above potential during the boom period and perhaps not quite so far below potential during the recession.

Many people believe that the previous decade had a housing bubble, with construction much higher than in normal times. If that is correct, the notion that the economy was producing output above potential prior to the recession does not seem that far-fetched. In that case, actual output today may not be as far below potential as a lot of people think.

Endnotes

  1. See Okun, Arthur M. "Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance," Cowles Foundation Paper 190, reprinted from the 1962 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. See http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cp/p01b/p0190.pdf. [back to text]
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Michael T. Owyang 
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.