Banking Analytics: Unrealized Losses Decrease Again at U.S. Banks

November 06, 2025
SHARE THIS PAGE:

The ratio of unrealized losses to total securities held by U.S. banks declined again in the second quarter of 2025, to 6.8%. That was down significantly from its recent peak of 12.2% in the third quarter of 2023. (See the figure below.) While these potential losses are not as large as they were several years ago, they remain a risk factor for some banks.

Banks hold securities—primarily fixed-rate Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities—for a variety of reasons. As liquid assets, they can be sold quickly to bolster bank balance sheets and cover credit losses or deposit outflows. They also serve as a source of bank income, supplementing what’s earned on loans. Unrealized losses are “paper” losses, so banks don’t lose money unless they sell the underlying securities prior to maturity.

U.S. Banks’ Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investment Securities as a Percentage of Their Securities Holdings

 A column chart shows unrealized gains as a percentage of total securities held by U.S. banks generally falling from more than 2% in the first quarter of 2020 to 0.5% in the third quarter of 2021. In the fourth quarter of 2021, unrealized gains as a percentage of total securities at U.S. banks became unrealized losses, which generally rose, to 12.2% of total securities in the third quarter of 2023, before steadily falling to 6.8% in the second quarter of 2025.

SOURCES: Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) and authors’ calculations.

Many banks loaded up on long-term investment securities during the COVID-19 pandemic, when deposits were plentiful and loan demand and yields were weak. When interest rates began rising in the spring of 2022, the value of banks’ securities holdings declined, in some cases dramatically. This resulted in growing unrealized losses, the difference between the purchase price and the current market value of investments when the market value is lower. The failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank in the first half of 2023 can be traced, in part, to the sharp rise in unrealized losses in their investment portfolios.

Short-term interest rates declined in late 2024 due to three reductions in the Federal Reserve’s federal funds rate target, taking some of the pressure off banks’ investment portfolios. But long-term rates—especially the 10-year Treasury rate and the average 30-year mortgage rate—have not followed suit, so unrealized losses have remained large.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Michelle Clark Neely

Michelle Clark Neely is a visiting scholar with the Supervision Policy, Research and Analysis team at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Michelle Clark Neely

Michelle Clark Neely is a visiting scholar with the Supervision Policy, Research and Analysis team at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Raelene Angle-Graves

Raelene Angle-Graves is lead policy analyst in the St. Louis Fed’s Supervision, Credit and Learning Division.

Raelene Angle-Graves

Raelene Angle-Graves is lead policy analyst in the St. Louis Fed’s Supervision, Credit and Learning Division.

Related Topics

This blog offers commentary, analysis and data from our economists and experts. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the St. Louis Fed or Federal Reserve System.


Email Us

Media questions

All other blog-related questions