Skip to content

Retirement Plans among Pre-retirement U.S. Households


Thursday, May 2, 2019

By YiLi Chien, Research Officer and Economist, and Qiuhan Sun, Research Associate

This post discusses the participation rate in, and account balance of, retirement plans among pre-retirement U.S. households in the past three decades.In the survey, pre-retirement U.S. households are defined as those headed by someone from age 50 to age 65. Our analysis utilizes Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) data from 1989 to 2016. The survey is suitable for our study because it provides cross-sectional data on U.S. households’ demographic characteristics, incomes, balance sheets and pensions every three years.

According to the SCF, the retirement accounts include:

  • defined-benefit pension plans
  • defined-contribution pension plans
  • IRAs (individual retirement accounts)
  • Keogh accounts

The retirement plan participants (or, alternately, nonparticipants) are therefore defined as those households that do (or do not) participate in any of the retirement accounts listed above.

There are two main findings in our study:

1. The Participation Rate in Retirement Plans Slightly Declined 

First, households’ participation rate in retirement plans over time had been roughly constant at 66% and even declined slightly in the past decade, to 62%. The figure below provides the supporting evidence.

Chart showing Participation Rate, Retirement Plans among Pre-retirement U.S. Households every three years from 1989 to 2016. Retirement plans include defined-benefit pension plans, defined-contribution pension plans, IRAs (individual retirement accounts) and Keogh accounts. Sources: Survey of Consumer Finances and author's calcultations.

Given that utilization of retirement plans provides various benefits, such as tax benefits and matching contributions, this finding implies that many U.S. households do not or cannot take advantage of such benefits of the retirement plans.

It also indicates that despite the introduction of “auto-enrollment” features for many 401(k) plans and the improved accessibility of many retirement accounts, especially IRAs, the nonparticipation problem persisted over time.

2. The Average Value of Retirement Accounts Grew Significantly 

Our second main finding is that the average value of all retirement accounts combined grew significantly during this period, as shown by the figure below. The average value increased from $54,000 in 1989 to $199,000 in 2016, indicating a more than 200% increase.Note that the dollar numbers reported are inflation adjusted to 2016 dollars and therefore can be compared directly. These numbers are also rounded to the closest $1,000.

Chart showing account balance of retirements plans among pre-retirement U.S. Households shown for every three years from 1989 - 2016. Retirement plans include benefit pension plans, defined-contribution pension plans, IRAs (individual retirement accounts) and Keogh accounts. Source: Survey of Consumer Finances and author's calculations.

Part of this huge increase was due to economic growth. Naturally, as the economy grows, aggregate assets are accumulated and thus increase over time, resulting in higher output and a higher living standard. Thanks to the long-term growth of the U.S. economy, the average household net worth (the difference between assets and liabilities) also grew 95% during the same time.

Nevertheless, note that the growth rate of retirement accounts, 268%, is significantly higher than the growth rate of net worth, 95%. This indicates that the significant increase in the average value of retirement balances was not only due to the growth of total U.S. assets, implying that retirement plan participants actually utilized their retirement accounts more heavily.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that inequality in terms of utilizing retirement accounts could rise over time. While we do observe that utilization of retirement accounts increased (among participants), there was no improvement of the nonparticipation rate over time. Although not participating in retirement plans does not necessarily imply not saving for retirement, these nonparticipants are definitely missing the benefits, such as tax savings, brought by these retirement plans.

Notes and References

1 In the survey, pre-retirement U.S. households are defined as those headed by someone from age 50 to age 65.

2 Note that the dollar numbers reported are inflation adjusted to 2016 dollars and therefore can be compared directly. These numbers are also rounded to the closest $1,000.

Additional Resources

Posted In Financial  |  Tagged yili chienqiuhan sunretirement401kirapension plansavingssurvey of consumer finances
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.