Skip to content

Labor Market Polarization across the U.S.

Monday, February 4, 2019

labor market Getty/HHakim
By Maximiliano Dvorkin, Economist, and Asha Bharadwaj, Research Associate

Labor market polarization refers to the decrease in job opportunities in middle-skill occupations that typically involve routine tasks, such as occupations in manufacturing, production and transportation. This is simultaneously associated with an increase in employment in occupations that involve nonroutine tasks, such as jobs in managerial and professional occupations and in personal care and service occupations.

Polarization in the labor market is linked to two main factors:

  • Increased automation of routine tasks
  • Increased globalization and offshoring

At the national level, we observe in the figure below that employment in nonroutine occupations—both cognitive and manual—has been steadily increasing since the 1990s. On the other hand, employment in routine occupations has been stagnant or declining.

routine manual occupation

Within the U.S., the composition of industries varies. We want to analyze the impact of job polarization at a regional level to understand how states and regions have been affected.

For this, we focused on state level trends in routine manual occupations. In 1990, the states with the highest employment shares in routine manual occupations were:

  • South Carolina (35.7 percent)
  • North Carolina (35.3 percent)
  • Mississippi (35.0 percent)
  • West Virginia (34.5 percent)
  • Arkansas (34.4 percent)

Change in Manual Routine Occupation Shares

Jobs losses from 1990 to 2016 is among the highest for some of these states. The figure below shows the difference in employment shares between 1990 and 2016 for manual routine occupations across the U.S.2016 represents the sum of employment in the years 2015 and 2016.

manual routine change

We observed that the only state to experience an increase in employment share was North Dakota (2.9 percent). Most likely, the boom in the oil industry led to many new jobs in manual routine occupations in this state.

All other states experienced a decline in employment shares. Some of the states that experienced the largest declines were states with the largest shares in 1990, such as:

  • North Carolina (-12.6 percent)
  • South Carolina (-11.7 percent)
  • West Virginia (-11.0 percent)

States like South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska and Iowa experienced a more moderate decrease.

GDP Growth during This Time

It would be interesting to look at the growth of GDP for the different states in this time period. We observed that states that experienced a greater decline in employment shares also experienced lower growth in real GDP per capita between 1990 and 2016.

The relationship between GDP per capita and labor market polarization is beyond the scope of this blog post and a fruitful avenue of future economic research. However, it is worth noting that job polarization has led to a decline in the earnings for middle-skill jobs, which is linked to an increase in earnings inequality.

Notes and References

1 2016 represents the sum of employment in the years 2015 and 2016.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged maximiliano dvorkinasha bharadwajlaborlabor market polarizationmanual routine occupations
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.