A Follow-Up to Oil Prices and Inflation Expectations

Monday, March 07, 2016
inflation expectations and oil prices

By Alejandro Badel, Economist, and Joseph McGillicuddy, Research Associate

This is a follow-up to “What Future Oil Price is Consistent with Current Inflation Expectations?” In the previous blog post, we concluded that, under several assumptions, “oil prices would need to fall to $0 per barrel by mid-2019 in order to validate current [breakeven] inflation expectations," as measured by the premium paid by standard Treasuries over inflation-protected Treasuries.

In this follow-up, we answer questions and requests contributed by several readers and market participants since February 23, when the post first appeared. First, we provide the oil price path that would validate current inflation expectations under the two alternative assumptions that the non-energy component of the consumer price index (CPI) grow at constant rates of either 2.18 or 1.99 percent. These are lower than our original assumption of 2.87 percent, which is the annualized growth rate of the all items less energy component between January 2014 and June 2014. We show that our conclusions are not dramatically affected under the alternative assumptions..

Second, we provide a formal description of our calculations. And, third, we provide a calculator in Excel (available here) that allows users to use their own assumptions and construct alternative scenarios.

Alternative Growth Rate for Nonenergy Components of CPI

The figures below provide two alternative assumptions for the growth of nonenergy CPI components, denoted g. The first figure displays results when g is 2.18 percent. This value corresponds to the annualized growth rate of the seasonally adjusted “all items less energy” component between December 2013 and June 2014. The second figure displays results when g is 1.99 percent. This value corresponds to the average annual growth rate of the unadjusted “all items less energy” component for the period 2005-15.

inflation expectations and oil prices

inflation expectations and oil prices

The figures show that the results do not vary dramatically with the assumption about the growth rate of CPI ex-energy. When this rate is 2.18 percent, the oil price series that would validate current breakeven inflation expectations reaches $0 by the end of 2024 instead of by mid-2019. When this growth rate is further reduced to 1.99 percent, oil prices do not need to be $0 to validate current breakeven inflation expectations, but they are required to fall to under $2.50 a barrel by 2024.

Additional Resources

Formal Description of Our Calculations

Consider inputs bt+k, CPIt, Et and Nt, where bt+k are breakeven rates for Treasuries maturing in k=1,2,…,10 years, CPIt is the current value of the CPI, and Et and Nt are the current values of the energy and nonenergy components of the CPI. We employ these inputs and the following four equations to construct a time series of future oil prices such that inflation expectations bt+k are validated by the future path of oil prices:

(1)          CPIt+k = αNt+k + (1 – α)Et+k,            k = 1, 2, …, 10

Equation (1) says that the CPI k years into the future is a weighted average of the nonenergy component N and the energy component E with fixed weight α. (The weight can be allowed to vary over time, which would require adding a fifth equation for the evolution of the weight.)

(2)          CPIt+k = CPIt(1 + bt,k)k,     k = 1, 2, …, 10

Equation (2) says that the CPI implied by the current breakeven rates, denoted CPIt+k equals the current CPI, CPIt, times the compound growth over k years implied by the breakeven inflation expectation bt+k.

(3)          Nt+k = Nt(1 + g)k,                k = 1, 2, …, 10

Equation (3) says that the nonenergy component, denoted Nt+k, grows at a constant rate g.

(4)          ln(Et+k) = β0 + β1ln(Pt+k),                 k = 1, 2, …, 10

Equation (4) says that there is an elasticity β1 of the energy component of the CPI, denoted Et+k, and crude oil prices Pt+k for k=1, 2, …, 10.

The implied oil price is constructed as follows:

Use equation (2) to construct the future CPI series consistent with current breakeven rates. Construct the nonenergy component using equation (3). Exponentiate equation (4) to express the energy component as a function of oil prices.

(4’)         Et+k = eβ0(Pt+k)β1,                                k = 1, 2, …, 10

Plug the constructed CPI from equation (2), the nonenergy component from equation (3) and the energy component as a function of oil price from equation (4’) into equation (1), and call this equation (1’).

(1’)         CPIt(1 + bt,k)k = αNt(1 + g)k + (1 – α)eβ0(Pt+k)β1,     k = 1, 2, …, 10

Take equation (1’), and solve for oil prices. This gives the oil price that validates breakeven inflation expectations.

(1”)        Pt+k = ((CPIt(1 + bt,k)k – αNt(1 + g)k) / (1 – α)eβ0)1/β1,           k = 1, 2, …, 10

In our calculations we set the parameters of the model as follows:

  • α = 0.92, the average relative importance of the all items less energy component from June 2015 to November 2015. (The December value was not yet available at the time of this analysis.)
  • g = 1.99, 2.18 and 2.87 percent.
  • β1 =0.46, from estimating equation (4) using ordinary least squares from January 1995 to July 2015. See “predicting inflation.”
  • β0 = ln(Et) – β1ln(Pt), so that the relationship in equation (4) holds exactly in the last period with observable data
Posted In Inflation  |  Tagged alejandro badeljoseph mcgillicuddyoiloil futuresinflationinflation expectationsbreakeven inflation
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.