Why Has the Share of Mortgage Debt in Default Fallen?

Thursday, February 11, 2016
mortgage debt default
Thinkstock/Andy Dean

The share of mortgage debt in default has fallen significantly since the Great Recession, and this is largely due to changes in the number of households falling behind in their mortgage payments, according to a recent Economic Synopses essay.

Research Officer and Economist Juan Sanchez and Technical Research Associate Helu Jiang decomposed changes in the share of debt in default into changes in four components:

  • Average debt in default
  • Number of households in default
  • Average debt
  • Number of households with debt

They computed the percentage change in the share of debt in default by adding the changes in average debt in default and number of households in default, then subtracting the changes in average debt and number of households with debt. The figure below shows the results of the decomposition by year.

mortgage debt default

Sanchez and Jiang noted three interesting findings:

Cause of Debt in Default Fluctuations

The authors explained that the share of households in default was very large when defaults were both increasing (2006-09) and decreasing (2010-15). They wrote: “The changes in the number of households in default confirm our earlier claim that the drastic decline in house prices between 2006 and 2009 caused negative home equity for more households.”

Sanchez and Jiang gave two possible reasons for this. First, a negative income shock triggered default for some households, leading to the sharp increase in mortgage debt default. Second, long delays in foreclosure proceedings gave homeowners a greater incentive to default: longer periods of “free rent.”

Increasing Debt Amounts

Sanchez and Jiang also noted that the average amount of homeowner debt from 2003 to 2007 put downward pressure on the share of debt in default. They wrote: “That is, since the average amount of debt was increasing, if the other three components had not increased, the share of debt in default would have decreased.”

Importance of Average Amount of Debt in Default

For the period 2006-08, part of the increase in the share of debt in default was actually due to an increase in the debt amounts of households in default. Declining house prices had a larger effect on households with larger amounts of debt, with more households from this group defaulting. As the authors pointed out: “Later in the recession, the importance of the average amount of debt was overtaken by the number of households in default as more and more households with similar characteristics chose to default.”

Conclusion

Sanchez and Jiang concluded that “the evolution of the share of mortgage debt in default can be accounted for mostly by changes in the number of households in default rather than changes in the overall amount of mortgage debt and the number of households with mortgages. Changes in the amount of debt in default also played a nonnegligible role, especially during the pre-crisis to early crisis periods.”

Additional Resources

Posted In Housing  |  Tagged juan sanchezhelu jiangmortgagesmortgage debtdefaultgreat recession
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.


Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.

Categories