Despite significant amounts of liquidity injected into the economy, it seems like a large amount never made it to the people and entities that would find it most useful, according to an article in The Regional Economist.
Senior Economist Fernando Martin noted three ways liquidity expanded in response to the Great Recession:
However, gross domestic product (GDP) is still below trend, growth has slowed down significantly, and inflation has been below the Federal Open Market Committee’s target. Martin suggested that a significant part of the additional liquidity did not go to those that would most use it, such as households and businesses. He noted: “It should then not be surprising that inflation has not picked up and that inflation expectations remain depressed.”
Martin covered the evolution of liquid financial assets, in terms of GDP, by sector. These assets include currency, checkable deposits, savings and time deposits, money market funds shares, Treasuries, and agency- and GSE-backed securities. He then discussed the holdings of these assets by three groups:
Liquid financial assets held by the domestic sectors showed a small but permanent increase from 108 percent of GDP in 2007:Q4 to 113 percent in 2015:Q2. Martin noted that this increase was due to a rise in savings and time deposits owned by households. “If we were not counting savings and time deposits, we would instead see a temporary bump in this sector’s liquid assets holdings, around the time of the financial crisis and the subsequent recession, but no permanent increase.”
The increase was more prominent when including the rest of the world. Liquid financial assets increased from 139 percent of GDP in 2007:Q4 to 160 percent in 2015:Q2. Martin explained that Treasury security holdings by foreigners have been increasing since the 1980s but accelerated starting in mid-2007, most likely due to a flight to quality. He wrote: “In other words, most of the liquidity expansion was acquired by a sector (the rest of the world) that was hungry for it—supply and demand moving together.”
He concluded: “In sum, although fiscal and monetary policies have been unprecedentedly expansionary, the liquid asset holdings of the users of liquidity have not increased dramatically. If anything, the response appears comparatively muted and consistent with pre-existing trends.”