Farm Income and Household Spending Down in Eighth District

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Farm income, farm household spending and capital equipment expenditures in the Eighth Federal Reserve District all declined in the fourth quarter relative to one year prior, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis’ most recent Agricultural Finance Monitor. The publication covers agricultural credit conditions in the Eighth District, which comprises all or part of seven states.1 Results are based on survey responses from 39 agricultural banks within the boundaries of the Eighth District.2

Farmland Values and Cash Rents

Quality farmland values in the Eighth District increased on average 0.8 percent from one year ago, but survey respondents were pessimistic about farmland values over the next three months. On the other hand, pastureland values declined 2.6 percent from one year ago, but respondents gave mixed responses about future values.

Similarly, cash rents for quality farmland increased on average 3.6 percent from one year ago, while respondents overall saw downward pressure on values over the next three months. Pastureland cash rents declined 2.1 percent from one year ago, while respondents were mixed on future values.

Farm Income and Expenditures

More respondents said farm income fell in the fourth quarter of 2014 compared with the same period one year earlier. The actual index value for the fourth quarter (78), while moderately low, is stronger than the assessment bankers offered for farm income over the next three months (61).3 Readers are cautioned that farm income is highly volatile and subject to seasonal patterns that occur in the agricultural sector.

Perhaps not surprisingly, farm household spending and capital equipment expenditures were also down in the fourth quarter relative to one year earlier. Respondents expected further declines in the first quarter of 2015.

Lending Conditions

A modestly larger proportion of bankers (index value of 114) reported an increase in loan demand in the fourth quarter relative to the same period one year ago. Bankers were equally divided, however, on their views of loan demand over the next three months relative to one year ago (index value of 100).

Notes and References

1 The Eighth District’s states are Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.

2 Due to a change in reporting, this publication no longer reports dollar figures for farmland and cash rents, as it had in previous issues.

3 Index results above or below 100 indicate proportionately higher or lower lender values.

Additional Resources

Posted In Output  |  Tagged agricultural finance monitorfarm incomefarmland values
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email For all other blog-related questions or comments, email