By Juan Sánchez, Senior Economist, and Lijun Zhu, Technical Research Associate
Default on mortgage debt played an important role in the recent financial crisis. Research at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis shows that the decline in house prices was the fundamental driving force behind the increase in defaults. After the decline in house prices, many households owned homes worth less than their mortgage. (That is, they had negative home equity.) In general, while only a small fraction of households with negative equity actually default on their mortgages, negative equity is a necessary condition for default. Otherwise, households would sell their houses, pay back their mortgages and keep any remaining funds.
The Federal Reserve Board of Governors collects data every three years regarding family incomes, net worth, balance sheet components, credit use and other financial outcomes. We used the recently released 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances to compute the percent of households with higher risk of default:
Since the values of the houses included in the survey are self-reported, the numbers should be interpreted carefully, because households living in their houses for long time may not have a good estimate of their house’s value.
The findings show that the percent of households with negative equity decreased only slightly from 2010 to 2013, and the levels look different than in 2004 and 2007, when the percent of households with negative equity was smaller than 3 percent. These findings imply that conditions in the housing market remain fragile and further improvement in house prices will be necessary to return to healthy mortgage market.
1 It is important to note that the denominator is not the number of homeowners but the number of homeowners with mortgages.
On the Economy
Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.
The On the Economy blog recently ranked in the top 20 on Feedspot’s list of top bank blogs.
About the Blog
The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.
Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.