Fewer Younger, Richer Households Have Negative Home Equity

Monday, November 17, 2014

By Juan Sánchez, Senior Economist, and Lijun Zhu, Technical Research Associate

In a previous post, we showed that, according to the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, many households remain underwater on their mortgages. Additional research shows that, together with home equity, the ages and incomes of households are important determinants of mortgage defaults. This post shows how changes between 2010 and 2013 in the percent of households with negative equity vary by age and income.

The overall ratio of households with negative equity to the total number of households with mortgages decreased 1.2 percentage points between 2010 and 2013. The table below further decomposes this overall change into two subgroups, according to income and age.

negative household equity

The results are striking. While this ratio increased from 13.5 percent to 16.0 percent for households with yearly incomes below $60,000, it decreased from 12.8 percent to 9.5 percent for households with yearly incomes above $60,000.

The change in the percent of households with negative equity also varies across age groups. From 2010 to 2013, it decreased from 18.8 percent to 13.5 percent, for younger households, while it increased slightly (0.3 percentage points) for older households.

Thus, the aggregate decline in the percent of households with negative equity is driven only by changes for richer and younger households. The opposite trend is actually observed for poorer and older households.

Additional Resources

Posted In Housing  |  Tagged juan sanchezlijun zhumortgagessurvey of consumer finances
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email mediainquiries@stls.frb.org. For all other blog-related questions or comments, email on-the-economy@stls.frb.org.