Skip to content

How Has the Bankruptcy Act Affected Bankruptcy Filings?

Monday, December 15, 2014

By Juan M. Sánchez, Senior Economist

It is well known that the number of non-business bankruptcy filings increased dramatically during the ‘80s and ‘90s. This period has been referred to as the “revolution in consumer credit and consumer bankruptcy,”1 as the number of Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings increased more than fivefold from 1983 to 2004. This process, which is associated with the decline in the cost of information,2 ended with the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) of 2005. In short, BAPCPA made bankruptcy filings more costly and more limited to low-income households. We focused on the evolution of the number of bankruptcy filings after the BAPCPA.

The figure below presents data on Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy filings for debt associated (predominantly) with non-business activity. Since the most recent information available is for the third quarter of 2014, the chart includes data for the third quarter of every year since 2001.


The figure shows two interesting patterns:

  • Chapter 7 filings increased dramatically in anticipation of BAPCPA.
  • Chapter 7 filings, and to some extent Chapter 13 filings, increased during the recession and have now been declining for four consecutive years.

The fact that bankruptcy filings have been declining while employment has been increasing should not be a surprise, since research has shown that bankruptcy filings follow fluctuations in the labor market quite closely.3

BAPCPA clearly had an impact on the number of bankruptcies being filed. However, the exact impact may not be known for some time, since the recession hit right after the BAPCPA was implemented.

Notes and References

1 Moss, David; and Johnson, Gibbs. “The Rise of Consumer Bankruptcy: Evolution, Revolution, or Both?,” American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Spring 1999, Vol. 73, Issue 2, pp. 311–351.

2 Sánchez, Juan M. “The IT Revolution and the Unsecured Credit Market,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2010-022B.

3 Athreya, Kartik; Sánchez, Juan M.; Tam, Xuan S.; and Young, Eric R. “Labor Market Upheaval, Default Regulations, and Consumer Debt,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2014-002C.

Additional Resources

Posted In Financial  |  Tagged bankruptcybapcpajuan sanchez
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.