The Aggregate Implications of Size-Dependent Distortions

January 10, 2018

Abstract

This article examines the aggregate implications of size-dependent distortions. These regulations misallocate labor across firms and hence reduce aggregate productivity. The author then considers a case study of labor laws in France, where firms with 50 employees or more face substantially more regulation than firms with fewer than 50. The size distribution of firms is visibly distorted by these regulations: There are many firms with exactly 49 employees. A quantitative model is developed with a payroll tax of 0.15 percent that applies only to firms with more than 50 employees. Removing the regulation while holding total employment constant leads to an increase in output of around 0.3 percent.


About the Author
Nicolas Roys

Nicolas Roys was an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and is a senior lecturer at Royal Holloway, University of London.

Nicolas Roys

Nicolas Roys was an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and is a senior lecturer at Royal Holloway, University of London.

Editors in Chief
Michael Owyang and Juan Sanchez

This journal of scholarly research delves into monetary policy, macroeconomics, and more. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the St. Louis Fed or Federal Reserve System. View the full archive (pre-2018).


Email Us

Media questions

Back to Top