Independence, Accountability, and the Federal Reserve System

May 01, 2020
Congress has given us an important degree of independence so that we can effectively pursue our statutory goals based on facts and objective analysis. We appreciate that our independence brings with it an obligation for transparency and accountability.
—Jerome H. Powell, Chair, Fed Board of Governors

The year 1979 was a pivotal year in U.S. economic history. Inflation had been rising during the 1970s and was running over 11 percent by June of 1979. That summer, President Jimmy Carter nominated Paul Volcker to chair the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Volcker was a larger-than-life public servant whose experience as undersecretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York had prepared him for the difficult task of taming inflation.

Volcker's (then controversial) strategy was to fix inflation by decreasing the growth rate of the money supply, even if that meant higher interest rates. And interest rates did rise. The federal funds rate, which was already 10 percent, reached 19 percent by mid-1981,2 pushing mortgage rates as high as 18 percent. These higher interest rates discouraged borrowing for consumption and investment, contributing to back-to-back recessions and an unemployment rate that peaked at nearly 11 percent.3

Volcker's policies quickly made him one of the most unpopular people in the United States. Farmers protested the high interest rates by driving their tractors to blockade the Federal Reserve's headquarters in Washington D.C., and construction workers mailed two-by-fours to Volcker with pleas to reduce interest rates written on them (Figure 1 below). But it wasn't until the summer of 1982 that Volcker felt confident that the Fed had broken the back of inflation.

Figure 1: 2x4 Wood Mailed in Protest to Paul Volcker

Home builders across the country were concerned about interest rates. This 2x4 sent to Fed Chairman Paul Volcker reads, "Help! Help! We Need You. Please Lower Interest Rates. Jackson Miss. Home Builders."

Wood block with handwritten note to Paul Volcker.

SOURCE: FRASER, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Today, many economists credit the long period of low and stable inflation since the Volcker years to his willingness to stand against popular pressure and deliver the powerful medicine needed to cure the nation's economic ills. While Volcker's persistence was necessary, the Volcker Disinflation (as it is now known), was only possible because the Federal Reserve had enough independence that its leadership could take the unpopular but necessary measures needed to reduce inflation.

Independence and Accountability

The Federal Reserve System was created as the central bank of the United States when Congress passed, and President Woodrow Wilson signed, the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The Federal Reserve Act, and the resulting institution, reflect two foundational beliefs—independence and accountability. Throughout its history, the Federal Reserve has felt the tension between these objectives—maintaining the independence necessary for sound policymaking while also remaining accountable to the electorate.4

Here's why independence matters: Elected officials serve relatively short terms; for example, two years for U.S. representatives and six years for senators. While short term lengths ensure that elected officials are accountable to the public, they can also create political incentives for politicians to pursue short-run outcomes over long-run outcomes. In other words, politicians are prone to focus on the next election—which creates what some refer to as the "political business cycle."

For example, because many voters hold the economy as one of their primary voting issues,5 elected leaders interested in winning their next election will likely resist efforts to increase interest rates in the short term, even if it would be a good long-term decision. In economic terms, this can lead to an inflationary bias (an ongoing preference for lower interest rates).

In contrast, effective economic policymaking often requires a focus on the medium to long run. For example, Volcker's policies resulted in job losses for many Americans in the near term. Over time, however, his policies restored people's confidence in the central bank's ability to maintain low and stable inflation rates and ushered in a period characterized by high employment and low inflation. This era is sometimes referred to as the Great Moderation.

As the Volcker era exemplified, creating an independent central bank allows governments to insulate monetary policy from short-term political motives. Evidence suggests that countries with central banks with high levels of independence also have lower average inflation rates.6

Representing Regional and National Interests

In many ways (not surprisingly) the structure of the Federal Reserve System is similar to the structure of the U.S. government. The economic power of the Federal Reserve is not concentrated in a single, or few, hands in Washington, D.C., or on Wall Street. Rather, monetary policies are made by policymakers distributed across the country.

The Federal Reserve balances national and local interests by having a centralized national Board of Governors and 12 decentralized regional Federal Reserve banks.7 The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, located in Washington D.C., is the governing body of the Federal Reserve System. It is an agency of the U.S. federal government and directly accountable to Congress. The Board of Governors has broad oversight responsibilities for the operations and activities of the 12 Federal Reserve banks. As such, the Board of Governors ensures that national interests are represented.

Figure 2: Districts of the Federal Reserve System

This map shows the Fed System's 12 regional Reserve banks and their branches. Reserve banks are headquartered in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco.

A map of the United States with a breakout of the 12 Federal Reserve Districts.

The 12 Regional Reserve banks are the operating arm of the Federal Reserve System. They provide financial services, supervise and examine banks, and lend to depository institutions within their Federal Reserve District. The 12 Federal Reserve Districts span the country geographically (Figure 2) and gather information about the businesses and communities in their respective region. This information is used when making monetary policy, to ensure that regional interests ("Main Street") are represented.

Checks and Balances

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is the body within the Federal Reserve System that determines monetary policy for the country. The committee consists of up to 19 participants—seven Federal Reserve Board governors (if all positions are filled) and the presidents of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks. The governors are political appointees: They are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. Governors are appointed to 14-year terms so that appointees serve beyond the tenure of the presidents who nominate them, reducing the likelihood that one president appoints a majority of the governors. Because the seven governors are political appointees, they are intended to be the most directly accountable to the public.

The 12 Federal Reserve Bank presidents are not political appointees. Each Federal Reserve Bank has a local board of directors whose members select its regional Bank president. All members of local boards of directors are subject to Board of Governors approval. And, appointments of Federal Reserve Bank presidents are also subject to Board of Governors approval. Because they are not political appointees, the presidents of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks are intended to be insulated from politics and to represent regional interests.

The FOMC consists of 12 voting members—the seven members of the Board of Governors (if all positions are filled); the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York8; and four of the remaining 11 Federal Reserve Bank presidents, who serve on a rotating basis (Figure 3). All 12 of the Federal Reserve Bank presidents attend FOMC meetings, report on economic conditions in their respective districts, and participate in the policy discussions, but only the five presidents designated as voting members at the time vote on policy decisions.9

This structure maintains centralized power but also makes sure that regional interests are represented in policy.

Figure 3: Federal Open Market Committee: Who Votes?

See chart description below.

SOURCE: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

The Power of the Purse

In the Federal Reserve Act, Congress gave the Federal Reserve the power to earn its own income. This income comes primarily from the interest the Fed earns on the government securities it acquires through open market operations.10 Because funding can be a way to wield influence, Congress did not give itself the "power of the purse" over the Fed. For example, if the Federal Reserve were dependent on Congress for funding, members of Congress could threaten to cut the Federal Reserve's budget to get the policy decisions they desired. The Fed does not keep all of its earning, however. After paying its expenses and legally mandated dividend payments to member banks,11 the Federal Reserve turns the rest of its earnings over to the U.S Treasury.12 For example, in 2019 the Fed sent the U.S. Treasury $54.9 billion.13

Is the Fed Audited?

The Board of Governors and the 12 Federal Reserve Banks undergo several levels of audit by the Government Accountability Office and outside independent auditors.14 To ensure transparency, the audited financial statements are available on the websites of the Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve Banks.15 In recent years, there has been an "audit the Fed" call supported by some legislators. The Fed already has regular traditional financial audits, so the intent here is something different. The call is for the Government Accountability Office to review the monetary policy decisions made by the FOMC. Other legislators, however, caution that such oversight could allow elected leaders to influence monetary policy—something Congress intended to guard against when they created an independent central bank.

The Fed Is Accountable to Congress and the Public

The U.S. Congress determines the goals of monetary policy (maximum employment, price stability, and moderate long-term interest rates), but it has given the Federal Reserve independence to achieve these goals.16 Along with that independence, the Federal Reserve is accountable to Congress for meeting its goals. Part of that accountability includes providing information to Congress and the public about its policy actions and the rationale for those decisions. The Fed does this in a number of ways. First, the Board of Governors prepares an extensive Monetary Policy Report twice per year, and the Chair testifies to Congress on those occasions.17

And, to provide transparency in the policymaking process, the FOMC issues a statement immediately following each of its eight annual FOMC meetings, publishes full minutes three weeks after each meeting, and publishes transcripts five years after each meeting.18 The Chair also holds a press conference after each FOMC meeting to explain (on behalf of the FOMC) its policy decisions.19 These press conferences are streamed live from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors website, and they are recorded, archived, and available to the public.

In addition, four times per year, the FOMC provides projections (forecasts) for economic growth, unemployment, and inflation, as well as information about each policymaker's projection of the appropriate level of the federal funds rate.20

Further, Federal Reserve Board governors and Federal Reserve Bank presidents contribute to transparency by making frequent speeches about their policy perspectives. And, the Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve Banks all provide information, publications, and education materials on their websites to help inform the public about the structure and function of Federal Reserve System and its policy actions.

Conclusion

Central bank independence is desirable because the near-term political goals of elected leaders can conflict with policy consistent with a country's long-term economic health. Economists generally agree that this is best accomplished by giving the central bank clear policy objectives (such and price stability and maximum employment), the political independence necessary to accomplish those goals, and accountability for meeting the goals.21 Congress included these characteristics when they created the Federal Reserve System as the nation's central bank.

About the Author
Scott A. Wolla

Scott A. Wolla is an economic education officer at the St. Louis Fed.

Scott A. Wolla

Scott A. Wolla is an economic education officer at the St. Louis Fed.

Related Topics

These essays from our education specialists cover economic and personal finance basics. Special versions are available for classroom use. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the St. Louis Fed or Federal Reserve System.


Email Us

-Media Inquiries

-Economic Education

Find More Economics and Personal Finance Resources

Back to Top