Skip to content

What’s Driving the Growth in Telecommuting?

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

The following post is the first in a two-part series on the growth of telecommuting and what may be behind this growth.

An increasing number of Americans are escaping the frustration of rush-hour traffic by working from home. Though still a small slice of the U.S. labor force, telecommuters account for a growing share of the country’s workforce, according to a recent article in the Regional Economist.

Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Regional Economist Charles Gascon, former Research Intern Iris Arbogast and former Research Associate Andrew Spewak found that 3.4 million people in the U.S., or 3% of full-time employees, reported that they primarily worked from home in 2017.This number omits work done at nonresidential settings, such as coffee shops or coworking spaces, and is thus likely a lower bound on the actual number of employees who work outside the traditional workplace. Compare that with the roughly 500,000 people, or 0.7% of the workforce, who did so back in 1980.

The figure is even higher if one included employees who sometimes worked at home. Using data from the Federal Highway Administration’s 2017 National Household Travel Survey, the St. Louis Fed authors found that an additional 7% of full-time workers telecommuted four days or more per month.

The growth of those who primarily worked from home hasn’t been linear, however. As seen in the figure below, the share of these workers slowly increased until around 2005, after which growth accelerated.

A Growing Share of U.S. Employees Working from Home

“Technological advancement seems like the most obvious factor leading to the increased ability to work from home,” the authors wrote. “However, we at least must consider the possibility that other factors may also be at play.”

Drivers of Telecommuting

The authors found that the share of workers who telecommute in production occupations and construction and extraction occupations is the lowest across all occupational groups: about 1% each in 2017.

Since the 1980s, U.S. employment has been moving away from manufacturing and production jobs and toward service sector jobs. As such, a “shift in employment away from these and other jobs with a relatively low share of telecommuting would increase the overall telecommuting rate in the economy absent of any new technologies,” Gascon, Arbogast and Spewak wrote.

For example, 5% of workers in management, business and financial occupations and 4% of workers in sales and related occupations telecommuted in 2017, they noted.

The authors then did a shift-share analysis to see how much of the growth in telecommuting might be explained by the shift from jobs with a relatively low share of telecommuting to those with a relatively high share of telecommuting.

“We found that only about 2% of the growth in telecommuting since 1980 can be explained by occupational shifts,” they wrote. “Technological advancement likely explains the rest.”

The second blog post will examine where telecommuting is more prevalent and which workers are more likely to be telecommuters.

Notes and References

1 This number omits work done at nonresidential settings, such as coffee shops or coworking spaces, and is thus likely a lower bound on the actual number of employees who work outside the traditional workplace.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged charles gasconiris arbogastandrew spewaktelecommutinglabor forcetelecommuterwork from home
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.