Is US Manufacturing Fundamentally Strong?


Thursday, May 17, 2018

strong manufacturing
Thinkstock/Wavebreakmedia

Many people think that the U.S. manufacturing sector is in a downward spiral and that it can no longer compete globally, but a recent Economic Synopses essay argues that is not the case.

The authors—Kevin Kliesen, a business economist and research officer at the St. Louis Fed, and John Tatom, a fellow at the Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health and the Study of Business Enterprise at The Johns Hopkins University—examined trends in U.S. manufacturing and concluded that its slump is largely due to the performance of the U.S. economy overall.

“We believe that U.S. manufacturing is fundamentally strong and that claims about foreign competition tend to be overstated,” they wrote.

Manufacturing in the U.S. vs. Other Countries

To examine the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing, the authors first compared its performance with that of seven other developed countries. In addition to the U.S., the seven other developed countries studied were France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the U.K. Kliesen and Tatom noted that these eight countries make up about 82 percent of manufacturing activity among all Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. U.S. manufacturing output accounted for a little more than one-third of this group’s total in 1997 and about 36 percent of this group’s total in 2015.

“By this standard, U.S. manufacturing is competing well against the manufacturing sectors of other large, developed countries,” they said.

Kliesen and Tatom also looked at China and found that China’s share of global manufacturing output increased 10.1 percentage points (to 19.7 percent) from 2005 to 2015. In contrast, the U.S. share declined 3.5 percentage points (to 15.3 percent) over that period. However, the authors added that China gained more manufacturing share from other countries.

“So, while China successfully expanded its market share compared with the United States, that success registered even more at the expense of China’s non-U.S. competitors,” they wrote.

Sensitive to the State of the Economy

Kliesen and Tatom noted that U.S. manufacturing continues to grow and to have a large global share, but its performance (especially in terms of productivity and output growth) has declined relative to previous periods.

They explained that U.S. manufacturing output and employment are sensitive to the state of the economy, as shown in the figure below. For example, manufacturing output and manufacturing employment declined 20 percent and 13.7 percent, respectively, during the Great Recession.

“We don’t see this as a signal that U.S. manufacturing is weak, however; instead, we see economy-wide factors at work,” Kliesen and Tatom wrote. For instance, they cited the slow growth of the U.S. population—and of the labor force in particular—as having an impact on long-term economic growth and employment.

“So, along with the aggregate economy, manufacturing output and productivity growth have been unusually slow,” they said.

Securing a Brighter Future for U.S. Manufacturing

The authors pointed out that, historically, manufacturing has seen rapidly rising productivity growth and declining employment, but that U.S. manufacturing output’s share of GDP has been roughly constant over time.

However, in recent years, manufacturing has not seen the strong output growth that might’ve been expected. Kliesen and Tatom attributed this to a slowing labor component and also to weaker manufacturing productivity growth. The latter, they added, has slowed since the end of 2007, both in absolute terms and relative to U.S. productivity growth overall.

They calculated that manufacturing output per worker increased at a 0.6 percent rate from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the third quarter of 2017, while real GDP per worker increased at a 0.9 percent rate. “Thus, weaker manufacturing output growth importantly reflects fundamentals in the aggregate economy,” the authors wrote.

Conclusion

Kliesen and Tatom concluded: “So, if there’s any credence to the view that U.S. manufacturing has diminished, it mostly stems from the nation’s slower economic growth process and very weak economic recovery. If aggregate productivity rebounds, it will be reflected in a re-energized manufacturing sector.”

Notes and References

1 In addition to the U.S., the seven other developed countries studied were France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the U.K. Kliesen and Tatom noted that these eight countries make up about 82 percent of manufacturing activity among all Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.

Additional Resources


Posted In Output  |  Tagged kevin kliesenjohn tatommanufacturingproductivityoutputemployment
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.