Link between Real Income and Future Population Growth

Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Thinkstock/Ryan McVay

People might think that cities with good amenities, high wages and a low cost of living would see relatively higher population growth over time and that cities with less favorable conditions would see relatively lower population growth.

A recent Economic Synopses essay examined whether this is true by looking at the link between real (price-level adjusted) income and population growth for the largest U.S. metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Economist Maximiliano Dvorkin and Research Associate Asha Bharadwaj found that real income in the early 1970s influenced population growth over the next few decades.

Adjusting for Regional Price Levels

To see if higher average real income was correlated with higher population growth, the authors first adjusted nominal income for cost of living differences across locations and over time. Dvorkin and Bharadwaj then plotted average real income in 1970 against population growth over the period 1970-2015.

They noted that there seems to be a positive correlation between the two variables and cited the following examples:

  • Seattle, Denver, Anchorage and San Diego had relatively higher real incomes in 1970 and high population growth.
  • Detroit, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh had lower real incomes in 1970 and lower population growth.

The authors also pointed out some exceptions: Atlanta, Houston and Dallas all had low real incomes in 1970 but high population growth. “Incomes in these MSAs, however, have grown rapidly since 1970, which could be a main reason for the population growth,” they explained.

(For a figure showing real income and population growth across the largest U.S. MSAs, see the Economic Synopses essay “City Growth and Real Income.”)

Other Factors

Dvorkin and Bharadwaj noted that other factors, such as an MSA’s amenities, could have also influenced population growth.

“The link between an area’s average real income and subsequent population growth, however, suggests that areas with currently high average real incomes will experience higher population growth in the coming years,” they concluded.

Additional Resources

Posted In FinancialLabor  |  Tagged maximiliano dvorkinasha bharadwajincomecost of livingpopulation
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.