How Quickly Do People Apply for Jobs?

Monday, November 13, 2017

Job applications

By Paulina Restrepo-Echavarria, Economist, and Brenda Samaniego de la Parra, Post-Doctoral Fellow

The volume and timing of job applications provide relevant information regarding labor market conditions. Moreover, they influence the strategies employers use to fill jobs, and those of people searching for work.

Using a database from DHI Group Inc.1 linking nearly 80 million applications to almost 10 million online job postings, University of Chicago Booth School of Business Professor and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Steven J. Davis and I (Brenda) highlight new facts about the search behavior of employers and workers.

First, applications per posting drop sharply as postings age, as seen in the figure below.2 After a job is posted:

  • 41 percent of all applications are received within the first 48 hours.
  • 56 percent arrive during the first 96 hours.

job applications

Furthermore, Davis and I found that postings are short-lived: Single-position postings have a mean duration of 9.8 days. The figure below shows the distribution of single-position postings by time elapsed from first to last active date.

filling jobs

Tracking postings and applications second-by-second, Davis and I are able to offer a new, more detailed view of the hiring process. Our measure of average posting duration accounts for roughly one-fourth of mean vacancy duration for similar jobs in the Jobs Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Thus, the “search” phase of hiring process—during which employers solicit and accept applications—is far shorter than the “selection” phase—during which employers screen and interview applicants, make and negotiate an offer, and wait for a decision.

How Employers Should Process Applications

The timing of application flows influences employers’ optimal search strategy. If most job seekers apply within a short period and there are no ongoing costs of posting a vacancy, employers should gather and review a batch of applications, rather than evaluating each one sequentially as they arrive.2

Davis and my findings regarding the concentration of applications in young vacancies, coupled with short posting durations relative to vacancy durations, weigh in favor of a nonsequential strategy.

How Job Seekers Should Apply

If employers review applications in batches, there will be delays between the submission of an application and the employer’s selection of a recruit.3 This creates incentives for job seekers to adopt a nonsequential search strategy as well, that is, to submit several applications at once rather than wait to hear back from each application before submitting the next one. Consistent with this theoretical implication, Davis and I found that job seekers submit applications for multiple job openings within the same 24-hour period. 

Notes and References

1 The following results refer to job postings in technology sectors, software development, other computer-related occupations, financial services, business and management consulting, engineering, and a variety of other professional occupations.

2 Davis, Steven J.; and Samaniego de la Parra, Brenda. “Application Flows.” Working Paper, March 7, 2017.

3 Morgan, Peter B.; and Manning, Richard. "Optimal Search." Econometrica, July 1985, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 923-944, and Van Ommeren, Jos; and Russo, Giovanni. "Firm Recruitment Behavior: Sequential or Non-sequential Search." Oxford Bulletin of Economic Statistics, June 2014, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 432-455.

4 Morgan, Peter B.; and Manning, Richard. "Optimal Search." Econometrica, July 1985, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 923-944, and Gautier, Pieter A. "Non-Sequential Search, Screening Externalities and the Public Good role of Recruitment Offices." Economic Modelling, March 2002, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 179-196.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged paulina restrepo-echavarriabrenda samaniego de la parrajob openingsjob applicationsjob postingspaulina restrepo-echavarriabrenda samaniego de la parrajob openingsjob applicationsjob postings
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.