Skip to content

U.S. Job Polarization Persists

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

The health of the U.S. labor market depends not only on the number of jobs created, but also the types of jobs created. One concern about the labor market is the issue of job polarization, or the idea that demand for high-skill and low-skill workers has increased while demand for middle-skill workers has decreased. Research has shown that job polarization existed for the past 30 years and was reinforced, rather than reversed, during the Great Recession.1

In a recent Economic Synopses essay, St. Louis Fed Economist Maria Canon and Senior Research Associate Yang Liu examined data suggesting that job polarization in the U.S. persisted after the Great Recession. Canon and Liu showed that from December 2007 through May 2014:

  • High-skill occupations grew an average of 1.23 percent per year.
  • Middle-skill occupations contracted an average of 1.25 percent per year.
  • Low-skill occupations grew an average of 1 percent per year.

Job polarization is expected to continue going forward. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects high-skill and low-skill occupations to average annual growth of 1.28 percent and 1.44 percent, respectively, over the next eight years. However, middle-skill occupations are expected to continue to decline, losing 0.9 percentage points of their share in total employment and growing on average 0.79 percent annually, a rate lower than the national average.

Canon and Liu concluded, “The U.S. trend toward job polarization has continued since the Great Recession and according to BLS projections is likely to continue in the coming decade. Specifically, the U.S. labor market is projected to increase demand for high- and low-skill workers, while its demand for middle-skill occupations will continue to diminish.”

Notes and References

1 Economist David Autor, for example, has authored several papers on the subject.

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged job polarizationmaria canonyang liu
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.