The Issues with New Unemployment Insurance Claims as a Labor Market Indicator

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

A recent article from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis explains why reports about initial unemployment insurance (UI) claims should be interpreted with caution. In an Economic Synopses essay, economist David Wiczer noted that a spate of good economic news had been filtering through the media in recent weeks:

  • The advance estimate of second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) was 4 percent at an annual rate.
  • 2013 GDP was revised upward.
  • Monthly private-sector employment growth had been above 200,000 for the past six months prior to the essay being published.

Wiczer pointed out that another piece of data being touted—initial unemployment insurance claims being at an 8½-year low—needs further explanation, as it is not unequivocally good news. He wrote, “The steady decline in initial UI claims also reflects larger macroeconomic trends of fewer job separations and fewer hires.” In his essay, he examined three reasons new UI claims are problematic indicators of the state of the labor market.

Long-Term Trends

Initial UI claims as a fraction of the labor force is lower now than in the 1980s and most of the 1990s. Wiczer noted, “It is certainly not because the labor market is doing much better than anytime during those two decades.” He wrote that several trends could be responsible for this change, such as eligibility requirements for receiving UI benefits, the number of separations in the economy and even the gender mix among the new separations (as men claim UI benefits less often).

Poor Predictors

Increases in unemployment can result from more workers separating from their jobs and entering unemployment or from currently unemployed workers finding jobs at a lower rate. Wiczer cited papers showing that approximately 75 percent to 80 percent of changes in unemployment rates are due to changing job-finding rates, rather than separations rates. He wrote, “As a proxy for separations, initial UI claims is inherently a weak predictor of changes in unemployment.”

Falling Rates

During the Great Recession, the rate of separations fell along with the rate of hires, so there were fewer people to initiate UI claims. Wiczer noted that despite the intuition that fewer job separations indicate a healthy labor market, a low level of separations also corresponds to a low level of hires. He wrote, “In fact, the rates of worker separations and hires slowed drastically during the Great Recession and are still about 10 percent lower than their prerecession levels, even though unemployment has recovered more quickly.”

Additional Resources

Posted In Labor  |  Tagged david wiczerunemploymentunemployment insurance
Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted. We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:
  • Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous
  • For commercial use, including spam
  • Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks
  • Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights
  • Off-topic or significantly political
The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters, so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may have in any comment you submit.
comments powered by Disqus

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog. You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them, please see this article.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.

Email Alerts  |  RSS

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Us

For media-related questions, email For all other blog-related questions or comments, email