Not long ago, teaching about money usually required coins and paper bills, Today, teachers must incorporate the abstract, knowing that students may be more likely to think of the payments system as ATM cards and debit cards rather than coins and paper.
Here's a brief overview of the basics of electronic payments—their benefits and drawbacks, related issues, and the role that the Federal Reserve plays in this advancing component of the payments system. The text is adapted from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1995 Annual Report.
When we talk about the nation's payments system today we're talking about mushrooming choices. In essence, the payments system encompasses any mechanism that allows parties in an economic exchange to transfer value. These mechanism range from the simple—you hand over 50 cents in coin at the soda fountain and get a soft drink in return—to the complex—Corporation X transfers $1 billion via computer network to 15 different financial institutions in five different countries in 3.2 seconds, the amount of time it takes to sign a check.
Today the U.S. payments system is the largest in the world with an average of 1.4 billion payment transactions totaling more than $1.5 trillion being processed daily. At their core, many new types of electronic payments are simply electronic delivery vehicles for traditional methods of payment. Some versions of electronic currency are connected with your bank account; others are not. Many new payment methods are initiated on PCs; others involve the use of telephones or interactive TV.
Inherent in these forms of electronic payments in convenience. Clearly, convenience sells in our economy. 24-hour groceries, drive-through laundries and fast food are all a part of the services we have come to expect. At a store in St Louis, you can get your hair cut, you shoes shined, your oil changed, and your car washed all in one place. And America's appetite for convenience hasn't been ignored by the financial services industry. Credit cards, drive-through tellers and ATM machines in shopping malls are evidence of that.
Technological innovations in the payments system are providing consumers with opportunities to increase not only convenience in the way we pay for goods and services, but also efficiency and reliability of payments. With such innovations, check fraud and currency counterfeiting could be curtailed. The cost of processing and delivering paper checks, estimated to be as much as one precent of the nation's Gross Domestic Product, could be drastically reduced.
On the other hand, emerging electronic payments options are not without risk. For one, businesses must first invest in the infrastructure necessary for widespread merchant and consumer use of electronic payment methods, such as retrofitting ATM machines or installing point-of-sale terminals. In addition, considering that 80 percent of all retail purchases in the United States are settled in cash, the vast majority of them for less than $20, providers of goods and services will need to make a strong case for the new payment alternatives to gain consumer acceptance and persuade people to change.
Many American's are already familiar with something called the stored-value card. This card is a credit-card-like instrument on which a monetary value is placed. For example, you give $20 to the photocopy center, the salesperson gives you a card with $20 of value, and the value is depleted as you make copies. Colleges have begun using such a system to allow students to buy books, pay fees, purchase a meal, do laundry or use an on-campus vending machine.
What separates the stored-value card from smart cards is that smart cards are embedded with a microchip that can recognize multiple uses. Microchip technology enables holders not only to keep cash value on their smart cards for purchases but also to charge a purchase to their credit card account, for example. With the smart card, you are able to transfer value from your bank account to your home PC to the card. Currently an estimated 750,000 households are banking through their computers—paying bills, applying for loans, tracking their checking, savings and money market accounts, as well as transferring funds among them, even getting stock quotes. Projections call for that number to increase to as many as 13 million by the year 2000.
Does this mean the end of cash, checks and credit cards as we know them? Probably not. These traditional payment methods are still the payment of choice for most of the population. Evolving payment options do, however, signal an approaching crossroads in the payments revolution. As with any change, the questions may at first outnumber the answers. There are several public policy issues facing government officials, regulators and the public. How will consumers know if an issuing authority is legitimate? What happens if an issuing authority fails? How will taxes be collected on electronic payments? To what extent is the information stored on your computer secured?
In 1913 the Federal Reserve System was established to provide a stabilizing element to the nation's banking system. The Federal Reserve was also given the responsibility to ensure the integrity and efficiency of the nation's payments system. These responsibilities include maintaining bank reserve accounts, furnishing currency for circulation, facilitating the clearance and collection of checks, transferring funds electronically, and acting as fiscal agent for the Treasury.
In carrying out its mandates, the Federal Reserve has over the years worked actively within the banking industry to make the payments system more efficient, reliable and predictable. For example, the Fed improved the efficiency of the payments system significantly with the creation of Fedwire, an electronic funds transfer system that links Reserve Banks to financial institutions and government agencies. Having operated for more than 70 years, Fedwire remains one of the most durable as well as critical, payments mechanisms in the United States. More recently, the Federal Reserve Banks have begun offering check imaging. With check imaging, customers receive no canceled checks. Instead, customers may receive monthly sheets of paper with 12 to 18 check images per sheet. Using high-speed processing equipment, the St. Louis Fed is capturing images of government checks and archiving them for the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Post Office.
While policy issues and practical uses of new technology surface, we should not lose sight of the fact that for any emerging payments technology to achieve long-term success, it must achieve three principal goals: It must maintain high levels of integrity, accessibility and efficiency. This has remained the challenge of payments throughout history. Integrity means keeping risk in the system at a minimum, as well as maintaining reliability and broad public confidence in the system's operation.
Accessibility means making the payments system conveniently available through one or more providers, regardless of the income or socioeconomic status of the user.
Efficiency means ensuring transaction speed, encouraging innovation and demanding cost-effectiveness. These guiding principles will be fundamental in formulating future Fed policy.
As today's payments system transforms itself, it won't always be easy to judge the value of a particular change, because its impact may not be exclusively positive or negative. In general, if a change leads to less risk, greater efficiency or broader accessibility, it will be good for the U.S. economy. If it increases risk, limits access or makes the system less reliable, it could threaten economic expansion ad stability.
As a central bank dedicated to the principles of free markets and private enterprise, the Federal Reserve has responsibility to let market forces, by and large, shape change in the payments system. At the same time, however, the Fed is committed to fulfilling its responsibility to protect the public's confidence in the payments system by focusing on the long-term goals of integrity, accessibility and efficiency.