How Trade Policy Is Changing: From Broad Rules to Targeted Restrictions
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- From 2015 to 2024, the number of new export-related trade restrictions introduced across the globe each year and the cumulative number of restrictions in place both grew, with a particularly sharp increase after 2019.
- During this period, trade restrictions accumulated steadily across a wide range of policy instruments, reflecting a sustained shift in how trade policy is used.
- Targeted measures, particularly export bans and licensing requirements, expanded much faster than traditional, broad-based trade instruments like tariffs.
- The effects of targeted trade restrictions are not spread evenly across the global economy; rather, they tend to be concentrated in certain strategic, high-value and high-technology sectors.
Over the past decade, trade policy in advanced economies has changed in important ways. Rather than relying mainly on broad tools like tariffs, governments are increasingly using more targeted measures, such as export controls, licensing requirements and other regulatory interventions. These policies are frequently aimed at specific products, sectors and trading partners, especially in areas linked to national security and technological leadership.
Recent Patterns in Trade Restrictions
Using data from the Global Trade Alert New Industrial Policy Observatory (GTA–NIPO), the following figures illustrate a clear increase in restrictive trade policies. The first figure shows the number of new export-related restrictions introduced each year. This number rose sharply after 2019, with a particularly large jump in 2020. Since then, the pace has remained elevated.
At the same time, the total number of restrictions currently in place has continued to grow steadily. The next figure shows the cumulative stock of active export-related restrictions over time, broken out by policy type. This reflects not just a temporary spike, but a sustained shift in how trade policy is used.
The figures highlight two key trends:
- The sharp increase in new trade interventions after 2019
- The steady accumulation of restrictions across a wide range of policy instruments
Together, these patterns show that trade policy is becoming not only more active, but more structured around specific tools targeting strategic sectors and technologies.
The Shift in How Trade Policies Are Structured
As the data demonstrate, the increase in trade restrictions is broad-based across different types of interventions, including export bans, licensing requirements, export taxes and other regulatory tools. (See the second figure.) Among these, export bans and licensing requirements have grown especially quickly. This suggests that governments are increasingly relying on administrative and regulatory mechanisms to influence trade flows.
A key takeaway is that modern trade policy is becoming more targeted. Instead of applying uniform restrictions across all goods or countries, policymakers are focusing on specific technologies and strategic sectors. Many of these policies appear motivated by concerns related to supply chains, technology transfers and geopolitical tensions.
This shift has important implications for the global economy. Because these policies are targeted, their effects are not spread evenly across trade. Instead, they tend to concentrate on certain high-value and high-technology sectors. As a result, even a relatively small number of interventions can have a large impact on economically important trade flows.
Recent tariff increases in the U.S. may signal an eventual shift away from this trend. Unlike targeted interventions, tariffs are typically broader in scope, affecting a wider set of products and trading partners. If such measures become more prominent, trade policy could move from a selective, technology-focused approach toward more generalized restrictions. This would imply a different pattern of economic impact, with disruptions potentially spreading more broadly across sectors and countries.
In short, trade policy is becoming more selective and strategic. Understanding where and how these policies are applied is essential for evaluating their economic effects and for anticipating how global trade patterns may evolve in the future.
Citation
Ana Maria Santacreu and Bontu Ankit Patro, ldquoHow Trade Policy Is Changing: From Broad Rules to Targeted Restrictions,rdquo St. Louis Fed On the Economy, May 26, 2026.
This blog offers commentary, analysis and data from our economists and experts. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the St. Louis Fed or Federal Reserve System.
Email Us
All other blog-related questions