And the
Survey Says:
Readers Value Bridges
Thank you, thank you. In January, we sent out a survey seeking
your input on Bridges. We wanted to know if you were reading the
newsletter, what you thought
about the content and how you thought it could be improved.
We were astounded and appreciative when nearly 450 readers, approximately 10
percent of our subscribers, responded. We were even more pleased to hear that
you enjoy Bridges and find it informative.
What else did we learn from the survey?
- Most of you, 73 percent, read every issue.
- Seventy-one percent of you have discussed an article with colleagues.
Others have made photocopies of articles for friends.
- More than 40 percent have used web site links in articles to
find out more information.
Interestingly, 64 percent of you would rather
receive the printed version of Bridges than read it on our web
site. And 51 percent
have no interest
in reading an electronic version.
What topics pique your interest? At least half said:
- small-business development,
- community development in urban areas,
- community development in rural areas,
- community development finance, and
- affordable housing.
Topics that did not receive as high a rating but still were of
interest include predatory lending, financial literacy and
regulatory issues.
What suggestions did you have?
Overall, we received more comments than suggestions for improvements.
The majority of comments were complimentary, referring to
the newsletter as
informative and inviting to read. Suggestions included letting
readers know how they
can
respond
to articles, publishing more articles about bank involvement
in community development, and featuring guest columnists from agencies
or businesses.
Who reads Bridges?
The majority of readers are either in the financial services or
community and economic development fields. The list also includes
educators, government employees, businessmen and students.
Again, thanks to all who took time to fill out the survey.
We now have a better idea about the kind of information our
readers
want.
Your
responses will guide
future editions of Bridges and ensure it remains an effective
communications tool.
back
to top
|