| Rural Communities
Look
for Entrepreneurial Spirit
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
| The Community Affairs staff at the Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis is focusing its efforts on small business and entrepreneurship
during 2004 and 2005. This is the second of several articles
scheduled in Bridges on those topics. |
|
Entrepreneurs do not operate in a vacuum.
Outside factors, such as where they live, can affect their success…or
lack of it. In rural areas, where resources often are scarce, entrepreneurs
might find it even more difficult to build their businesses.
The rural community’s role in the process is vital. It can provide a supportive
environment for entrepreneurs or inadvertently create an environment lacking
the right combination of resources and support. Understanding the conditions
that either support or hinder entrepreneurial activity is useful information
for communities interested in fostering startup businesses. Knowing how to assess
current community conditions and changes in entrepreneurial activity that are
the result of specific programs and policies is also useful.
The Rural Entrepreneurship Initiative (REI) was created in 1999 by the Ewing
Marion Kauffman Foundation, Rural Policy Research Institute, Partners for Rural
America, National Rural Development Partnership and the Nebraska Community Foundation
to strengthen rural America through entrepreneurship. REI also supports learning
that enables rural America to build a stronger and more supportive environment
for entrepreneurship.
In 2000, Missouri and three other states (Maine, Minnesota and West Virginia)
were selected to participate in REI’s Discovery State Academy Program.
The purpose was to help leaders in these states better understand rural entrepreneurial
opportunities and then develop programs and policies that support entrepreneurship.
The Discovery State Academy Program began in Colorado and Texas the following
year.
The Missouri REI team knew the U.S. Small Business Administration considered
nearly 98 percent of Missouri’s businesses “small,” and that
they represented almost 50 percent of the state’s total employment. In
rural Missouri communities, as in most places, there is a wide spectrum of economic
development activities. At one end are communities where businesses are beating
a path to their door, offering good job opportunities. At the other end, the
daily battle is to retain the few remaining retail establishments that bring
in just enough sales-tax revenues to keep county services operating. For certain,
the team knew little about what accounts for this unevenness in entrepreneurial
activity and what makes a culture of entrepreneurship.
The team set out to test a Kauffman Foundation theory that every community has
a culture related to entrepreneurship and that each could make improvements to
its entrepreneurial environment. In reviewing and discussing the latest research,
the team focused on four questions:
- What are the environmental factors that influence rural entrepreneurship?
- How can a community measure how healthy the entrepreneurial
climate is?
- How can these measurements be used in the decision-making
process to choose programs and policies that will
have a positive impact on the community’s
entrepreneurial climate?
- What benchmarks can be used to measure changes in entrepreneurial
activity over time?
Assessment Tool Developed
As a result of the research, Missouri REI worked with the Community
Policy Analysis Center (CPAC) at the University of Missouri-Columbia
to design a user-friendly
assessment tool for rural communities to measure variables that influence entrepreneurial
activity. The tool contains questions related to 10 variables that have an impact
on the entrepreneurial climate of a community. Both tangible and intangible factors
were identified, and questions were designed to solicit perceived performances
in each of these 10 factors. (See Table at bottom of article.)
The researchers developed a 65-question survey to quantify the perceived importance
and performance of the variables identified as instrumental in a community’s
entrepreneurial climate. Perceptions of a community’s performance in areas
such as loan availability, education and training opportunities then could be
compared with data available from secondary sources. Survey information can serve
as a baseline for a community to compare its performance with future years.
In addition, it might be of some value for communities to compare their scores
with communities of similar population size or comparative proximity to an urban
center. An analysis that tracks changes of the perceived climate for entrepreneurs
among a number of communities—along with documentation of strategies and
policies implemented to improve a community’s entrepreneurial climate—might
lead to theories of what community variables and strategies have an impact on
entrepreneurial activity.
Field Testing and Survey Results
The Missouri communities of Fayette, Albany and Dexter were selected
for field testing the assessment tool primarily on the basis of
differences in their
population, proximity to
metropolitan areas, and availability of economic development staff to coordinate
interviews with key people in the community.
Local economic development professionals were asked to arrange face-to-face interviews
with individuals in the business community. The survey was not intended to be
a random sampling. Rather, it targeted those with experience and knowledge of
the community’s entrepreneurial climate: new business owners or those who
work with new business owners.
During November and December of 2002, surveys were conducted in the three communities.
In Fayette and Albany, on average, one-hour, face-to-face surveys were completed.
In Dexter, CPAC staff made a presentation on the intent of the REI project at
a chamber of commerce event. Because a large percentage of the business community
was in attendance, the questionnaire was distributed and individuals completed
it over the next hour.
At least 20 people were surveyed in each of the three communities. Of the 63
people who completed surveys, 37 were business owners. The majority of the others
provided business services, such as financial services, technical assistance
or education.
A primary research question addressed during field testing of the survey was
whether it is possible to quantify the perceived importance and performance of
a community’s entrepreneurial climate. Tangible factors, such as access
to capital for business startups, can be compared with available data on the
actual number of business startups, for example. As anticipated, less-tangible
factors are harder to measure. The tool developed as part of this research serves
as a starting point for communities that want to improve their entrepreneurial
environment.
Conclusion
The self-assessment tool created by this project can be used to establish a baseline
for the current entrepreneurial climate within a community. As an increasing
number of rural communities use the tool, more will be learned about the factors
that influence entrepreneurial development. Over time, researchers also will
learn which local strategies produce results and in what kind of time period.
The findings might help shape programs and policies at local, state and national
levels.
During 2003, the Missouri Rural Opportunities Council partnered with CPAC to
continue refining the assessment tool and to develop a guidebook that includes
strategies for enriching a community’s entrepreneurial environment. A
revised version of the assessment tool went through a second field test in
the three
original communities plus nine additional rural communities. Preliminary responses
indicate a strong interest in using the assessment tool and guidebook to target
key areas for improving a rural community’s entrepreneurial climate.
A series of forums are scheduled throughout Missouri to introduce to community
leaders the self-assessment tool, which has been dubbed Growing Entrepreneurs
from the Ground Up. In addition, it will be published for wider distribution
at the Fed’s Small Business: The Fabric of Our Community conference in
Memphis in April 2005.
Information for this article was extracted from the Missouri Entrepreneurship
Initiative Final Report with permission from Vickie Rightmyre of the Community
Policy Analysis Center (CPAC) at the University of Missouri-Columbia. For text
of the entire report, go to CPAC’s web site, www.cpac.missouri.edu.
Ten Variables Impacting Entrepreneurial Climate |
Tangible Factors
Financial Infrastructure
- knowledge of financial tools available to assist
new businesses
- willingness to use financial tools available to assist
new businesses
- access to venture capital
- familiarity of lender with borrower
Physical Infrastructure
- adequate and affordable building space
- adequate and
affordable land
- highway accessibility
- adequate water and sewer services
- adequate phone
services
- adequate high-speed Internet access
Business Support Services
- technical assistance available
- legal and accounting services available
- adequate financial services
- printing and marketing services available
Natural Resources
- attractiveness of area as a place to live
- quality and sound stewardship of natural resources
Human Resources
- adequate current and future skill levels for new
businesses
- adequate education and training to meet business
needs
Intangible Factors
Governance
- local government support for new business development
through policies, ordinances and planning regulations
- local public bodies work together
- local government is open, transparent and democratically
accountable
- local government is responsive to requests and
needs of those starting a new business
- local government is willing to pursue and use public
funds to support new business development
Market Access
- local businesses pursue markets, both local and
beyond
- local businesses take advantage of trends and new
marketing strategies
Social Infrastructure
- opportunities to network, either planned or unplanned,
and formal or informal
Quality of Life
- affordable housing available
- affordable health care available
- low crime rates
- recreational and cultural opportunities available
for wide range of community members
- local schools prepare youths for employment and/or
entrepreneurship
Community and Cultural Norms
- an appreciation and acceptance of people who start
businesses
- an acceptance of controversy as normal and an ability
to deal with controversy
- broadly shared leadership
- sense of community identity
- supportive attitude toward innovation and initiation
|
back
to top
|