The Payments Evolution

Throughout history, society has searched for more expeditious ways to pay for goods and services. Shopping on the Internet, for example, is merely a more convenient way of shopping without leaving your home. Similarly, early societies searched for ways to improve upon the most ancient form of payment in history--bartering. With bartering, you found a partner in a direct exchange of value. When you traded your chickens for a cow, the exchange was immediate and final--no one wondered whether sufficient funds were available to complete the transaction.

But whatever the benefits in immediacy and finality of the transaction, bartering was impossibly inefficient:   It required a significant investment of time as individuals searched for willing participants with whom to enter into an exchange of goods and services. To lower the costs attendant with searching for trading partners, ancient societies eventually created commodities, widely recognized as valuable, that could be exchanged for goods and services. This was likely the case in the city-state of Lydia, which minted what is believed to be the first coins some 3,000 years ago. Many commodities involved some form of precious metal, but other commodities, as varied as the cultures that engaged in commerce, also thrived. For instance, while we know that Rome was not built in a day, you could say that Roman soldiers worked for peanuts--salted, that is, since they were at one time paid in salt.

The agreement on a common medium of exchange and the organized issuance of coins vastly improved the payments system of ancient times by standardizing the value of money and allowing for convenient measures by varying the metal content in the coins. But coins had obvious limitations, especially when one attempted to conduct expensive transactions over long distances. The 13th century Chinese sought to resolve this problem by creating paper money. This action required the Chinese emperor to issue two edicts:   one that established what paper currency was worth, the other that imposed the death penalty on anyone found counterfeiting it.

As the Chinese innovation suggests, a more sophisticated payments system was necessary to accommodate the complexities of commerce engaged in by developing civilizations. This need was especially critical for early 17th century Europe to support its burgeoning international trade and exploration. The Bank of Amsterdam, established in 1609 and considered the first public bank, was developed to serve the merchants of that booming city who found it difficult to distinguish the precise bullion content in the silver and gold coins being minted by numerous mints operating in the Dutch Republic.

The early successes of the Amsterdam bank stimulated interest in establishing similar institutions in other European countries. The Stockholms Banco was established in mid-17th century Sweden to engage in "lending" and "exchange" banking. Although it acted as a private institution, its managers were appointed by the government, and the Crown retained half its revenue. The bank's principal, Johan Palmstruch, is recognized for developing notes of credit that allowed the bank to better control the demand for its stock of copper coins, which were the primary means of payment. These notes substituted for the hauling of huge bags of copper coins to transact business; they quickly gained widespread acceptance.

Although the bank failed in 1663, the Swedish government built upon the country's banking experiences, and in 1668 the parliament chartered the Bank of the Estates of the Realm. The government's influence and control in establishing such a "national" bank was evident from day one, and the bank evolved, like many of the pioneering efforts toward central banking, as a commercial bank whose largest customer was the government. While it would not acquire the attributes we associate with modern central banks until much later, the Bank of the Estates of the Realm would eventually evolve into Sweden's central bank, the Riksbank.

Like its European counterparts, the U.S. central bank evolved in response to the needs of a payments system strained by the demands of a growing national economy. But it would require more than 100 years to develop the institution we recognize today as the Federal Reserve. The nation's first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, recommended to Congress that a national bank similar to the Bank of England be established to provide banking services to both the public and the government. The Bank of the United States was chartered in 1791 and proved to be a valuable component of the nation's flourishing economy:   It not only competed as a commercial bank, but also invoked market discipline on other banks by returning their notes promptly for redemption. Such actions didn't endear the Bank to its private counterparts, however, and political pressure mounted to close it.

In 1811, an extension of the bank's 20-year charter was resoundingly defeated in Congress. Five years later, the Second Bank of the United States was established, largely in response to the monetary disorder that followed the War of 1812. It, too, was unable to overcome political opposition, and an extension of its charter was vetoed by President Andrew Jackson in 1832.


[Return To Previous Page]

[Continue To Next Page]